Re: [113attendees] IETF 113 Update: 2022-02-10

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 21 February 2022 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613373A10DF for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 06:21:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.045
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.045 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3X5EwZG1ryLU for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 06:20:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D5C63A09CF for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 06:20:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 21LEKuMF003021 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:20:56 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CC59204FE5 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:20:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735D6204FE1 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:20:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.32.130] (is245935.intra.cea.fr [10.8.32.130]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 21LEKu5Z016126 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:20:56 +0100
Message-ID: <c85e5be2-cc56-1b5f-512f-6431399b905e@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:21:15 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1
Content-Language: fr
To: 113attendees@ietf.org
References: <9989E0B6-A0F6-4A4C-A681-FDB6C046455D@staff.ietf.org> <718578905.42881.1645007735648@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <07d87027-8162-b421-f157-6fff580d0b8b@go6.si> <26EB1DEC-9132-433B-9F62-F7ECD32C92BE@ietf.org> <673975951.57450.1645180642551@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <f6df5ca5-22f0-6c6e-3872-1ad8b63817a6@go6.si>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f6df5ca5-22f0-6c6e-3872-1ad8b63817a6@go6.si>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/113attendees/07-SSjLIpvv3jlwJkVgPsv_4S7g>
Subject: Re: [113attendees] IETF 113 Update: 2022-02-10
X-BeenThere: 113attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 113 attendees <113attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/113attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:113attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 14:21:05 -0000

I agree most countries give up on measures.   I give up maintaining a list.

Le 21/02/2022 à 14:41, Jan Zorz - Go6 a écrit :
> On 18/02/2022 11:37, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>> Thanks, this is the answer I was looking for. So I know that, if that final
>> decision will happen as scheduled, after the end of this month the physical
>> part of the meeting could still be cancelled in the uncontrollable case of a
>> new surge in cases in March, but not in the controllable case of the IESG
>> changing their mind on whether to hold a hybrid meeting.
> on another note - here in Slovenia (neighours of Austria) our gov't lifted
> pretty much all restrictions re RVT :)
>
> https://www.gov.si/en/topics/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/
>
> "As of 21 February 2022, the RVT rule will no longer be required except in
> healthcare and social care institutions and in prisons.
>
> Measures that are still in place to contain the spread of COVID-19 infections:
>
> hygienic measures: sanitising, keeping social distance
> wear a face mask in closed public spaces and on public transport,
> wearing face mask in school.
>
> As of 19 February 2022, restrictions due to Covid-19 no longer apply when
> entering Slovenia. This means that:
>
> the RVT (recovered/vaccinated/tested) condition no longer has to be met at the
> border and travellers will no longer be ordered to quarantine at home."
>
> Similar thing is going on also in other European countries and we cautiously
> expect/hope that Austria will not be an island ;)
>
> No covid restriction/measure is currently effective and stops Omicron from
> spreading, so why even bother :)


There might be an answer to that question - long covid.

But it is difficult to understand it for myself.

Alex


>
> Cheers, Jan
>
>
>
>