Re: [113attendees] IETF 113 Update: 2022-02-10

"Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs.ietf@gmx.at> Fri, 18 February 2022 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <rs.ietf@gmx.at>
X-Original-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065F03A0E35 for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 10:46:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.612
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.612 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aMIEoTFe_iAU for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 10:46:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 872E63A0E0B for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 10:46:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1645209970; bh=oxyiW2cp+N+DhlUzMa6I3oiKmuCr7rhom+Wqa7Za7Mk=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=KBcjUMYvufvTOpPi1/OvVL20Y1KPL2zFa0ux/rEEKDoDGhHn4ctbq0dzDWWin/36M xDQpBEILoSFfGzwwsNccYbOesXyaub5ZezUndEfBra+6kKpjNRL9NBzl3qcK1Pqkmc ceOw8RUZsOy2Xtn+DAGYjaJhxt3aHAvSBaKauhQU=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.233.112] ([185.236.167.136]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MtOKi-1o7s4a1qbG-00utSN for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 19:46:10 +0100
Message-ID: <fae1457e-ac8d-73e6-b1bf-849520cc1b90@gmx.at>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 19:46:10 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.1
To: 113attendees@ietf.org
References: <41FACD64-7B36-4842-AF45-308AD35276D6@tzi.org> <90572B0D-F4A8-4D10-A27E-80C545568E4E@ietf.org> <4bc7c820-b671-14c5-32b4-e1001b66aa76@na-nic.com.na> <3ee7e6d1-32e7-6572-b39f-e22a65ea7026@gmail.com>
From: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs.ietf@gmx.at>
In-Reply-To: <3ee7e6d1-32e7-6572-b39f-e22a65ea7026@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:V9F1L7AfWndlxvMUu/tdSL1B6e5AuBapVYRJjkSEYNshlt0HQOc d8ThZuOzVV36kLIbNzGRKo9IMDNZ95q1n85JhqBrPaALYgDNDcOEtJew0a1xIDQ/5T8QGfo kiI4QQ2JIyG8Or1BzbjqcY4arvg9OJdnaBf08jFvZKgwNv9LtsJNjNl9jQgrkzw6yIbJbNU ezjI46r3tWAE8aMmy0bBw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:t/tsTz8rG+Q=:AghWh2AHzv4CcGGO7cUJhG Gwrv2MEje5ZnwekEg6ktfKkp2tj1kjdtCdTXfqDkOZ4DKfqMp8RV+gWmsLBKRAF7U6v8OKDKg euIzQTQQm3ZdCl/R3vcXCIhoAqhI0h1qXOxhgyST4105wagAclJVzAZBdCwAsQHu7p0LND8r9 KMGJqV2NR3CKW6T7hmPzgAtSE6L5uf+SUbPrd53eM2qpwlHrGfMyNBCNosw/dUOzvGgDNJVbo 67ZalNte7V+rry6E0hH3YrYBWz38XwTxSWSFPbfPiVThqlqhMTdSW6+aRX4O71Uh2/QO6L8g+ V2QEOdGBK2+iwyOsp+kT3UqMG75z/UdNE4gyfczy39kt7o+7n/gPA2gvrYUcLa/40Efn9sin9 8qmD0vClTUuD9XMRhAiuuMQWR5QH3tquPKmYCq0831FdmjUeugw49nk6vapgOkbKcgl7zZ0/u kkHZaXrV4XkqlAkAF/O0/rV4/zxWleiTQI1YK6yoQnN9YpELnXaCPSRS9NfqCGDf1mejGOHWo sH/OopBbux7HkiDqy+N3pHs4fv6+UJ83t6DUOlLQVVRtx0b07utAW4EwKgrV2z+VZIz/Ypwy8 Sxjetw5e9euKInPTXS2Q7gcVw8O9Q0XmTDN+NgrKwG4nSJLVYocAkYDISTazbeuijJfW6KMd8 H2ETbmp/CZD9lB2DhwCaeRvgurXtKGJ0FyJ5i9PtK3PFwNaOxxGuG5Bu0WfZthyKv+30XKeIJ E5q2Qp/FR8Yl1/jX9cm4YNJYnUCoVilJOL4IwnpDgpvQ4UioNAwCcD2GEVhILm00oFlXM6vJP kjce+9uIVaLKL2zjBhdxh/fh2x0pBLU415HFuH2h8U/6w5eoUOxlz5NVSo8wVaX9KHKX8+sQe 5mPnNS22I0qS7yjvW1Gfsw0/u792JNb1RkelvSzYkuSAVSE7Kcr4sNqz+R37B8L+yHFd2EnRg RPrdnUr9a5eIjz8WCsRhcaM6XMNNiJDL1X1CsbSCIC1TK5qo5VCQHk6SI+AgPMqGSfk5nPZhT fEpeTzUaBzARwW7N9xW9F5Zp1mKqkPhVHU0D3/qBP3dTPNU+UBX7drYcf7VOZmR0wHDfiUuW5 IgeEfxtRQuWerM=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/113attendees/RFIEA3vjX1XtOrWB2FyQisV_z8Q>
Subject: Re: [113attendees] IETF 113 Update: 2022-02-10
X-BeenThere: 113attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 113 attendees <113attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/113attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:113attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 18:46:18 -0000


Am 18.02.2022 um 18:51 schrieb Alexandre Petrescu:
> That potential R interpolation function, applied to that Austrian data,
> could be valuable help in predicting more precisely than the current
> predictions that can be visible at
> https://www.sozialministerium.at/Informationen-zum-Coronavirus/COVID-Prognose-Konsortium-2022.html#februar-2022
>

That is very unlikely, that you get to better predictions using
simplistic models. The ones published above are done like weather
simulations, with agent (single individual) behavior modelling, feedback
loops and ensemble forecasting. The sum total of all these various runs
are accumuated and contribut to the confidence intervals depicted.

Human behavior is probably at least as complex as weather patterns, thus
the limited time range (only 7 days, with a population of 9 mio in austria).

> Probably this would predict that the next peak would be in 7 months time
> (I dont know?), which means peak in August 2022.  August is much far
> away than March.

Do not forget that these peaks were all driven by different variants of
the virus, and when/how fast a new, more evolutionary fit subtype
emerges, is a stochasic process - which can not be modelled on an
individual basis.

It is not impossible for Covid to become more contageous but even less
problematic (like the two other endemic coronaviridae types, which cause
seasonal flu symptoms - mostly), which is the more probable outcome.

Or more deadly (CoVID is said to share a lot of lineage with MERS/SARS
coronavirus, which had a 10% and 30% mortality. The worst case would be
a type that is as contageous as Omicron, but as fatal as MERS at 30%
after 14 days, such that infected individuals have had plenty of time to
spread it around before becoming sick)