Re: [113attendees] Breaking news: IETF 113 will be after removal of virtually all CoVID measures

Corine de Kater <corine.dekatermuehlhaeuser@inf.ethz.ch> Fri, 11 March 2022 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <corine.dekatermuehlhaeuser@inf.ethz.ch>
X-Original-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15B73A0CAA for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 13:06:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P49aQp5APgiO for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 13:06:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailg210.ethz.ch (mailg210.ethz.ch [IPv6:2001:67c:10ec:5606::21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 848983A0CA4 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 13:06:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailm211.d.ethz.ch (2001:67c:10ec:5603::25) by mailg210.ethz.ch (2001:67c:10ec:5606::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 22:06:23 +0100
Received: from smtpclient.apple (213.55.225.63) by mailm211.d.ethz.ch (2001:67c:10ec:5603::25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 22:06:23 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-EB28E859-E51A-4F51-BF7B-ED8A56D72335"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Corine de Kater <corine.dekatermuehlhaeuser@inf.ethz.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 22:06:22 +0100
Message-ID: <A4CC6F02-72BA-4A17-90F2-7A85697A3632@inf.ethz.ch>
References: <437e921b-cf56-4680-b8a4-b19f93c6a503@Spark>
CC: 113attendees@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <437e921b-cf56-4680-b8a4-b19f93c6a503@Spark>
To: Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.na>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18G82)
X-Originating-IP: [213.55.225.63]
X-ClientProxiedBy: mailm217.d.ethz.ch (2001:67c:10ec:5603::31) To mailm211.d.ethz.ch (2001:67c:10ec:5603::25)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/113attendees/7V_KsamhKbKVqLyyLf8ijC6S0CM>
Subject: Re: [113attendees] Breaking news: IETF 113 will be after removal of virtually all CoVID measures
X-BeenThere: 113attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 113 attendees <113attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/113attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:113attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 21:06:38 -0000

Hi everybody,

As far as I know, Vienna has tighter rules than the rest of Austria. FFP2 masks are still mandatory in most indoor public areas, including all shops and museums. At restaurants, bars, clubs and gyms, the "2-G" rule (vaccinated/recovered) applies. 
Additional information is available at:
https://www.wien.info/en/travel-info/corona-information/your-safe-stay-in-vienna-388282

Best, 
Corine de Kater

Von meinem iPhone gesendet

> Am 11.03.2022 um 20:52 schrieb Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.na>:
> 
> 
> Nobody will prevent you from wearing a mask.
> 
> The figures in the link don't look right to me, actually, but then I look at the Johns Hopkins University data set (almost) daily, and the rolling 7-D incidence is usually expressed per 100000 not a Million.
> 
> And, the rolling 7 Day incidence per 100000 is a reasonable indicator in places like Namibia where access to good healthcare is not universal.
> 
> But in EU countries the important issue currently is to prevent overloading the universal and good healthcare systems. Prevention (7 day incidence) is better in my considered view but no longer tolerated by the electorate.
> 
> 
> Btw, bald allegations of government motivation (previous post) are not helpful.
> 
> 
> el
> On 11. Mar 2022, 19:11 +0200, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, wrote:
> Thank you, Alex and Rohan, for the added information[1] If interested to check the new cases comparison between weighted IETFers (per country), Austria, your own country, then you may have a look at https://ehealth.vyncke.org/ietf/ Regards -éric [1] with those rules and very bad Austrian numbers, I am not sure whether I will venture outside of the hotel... Let's hope that the Hilton has good wines and meals ;-)
> [...]
> -- 
> 113attendees mailing list
> 113attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/113attendees