Re: [113attendees] IETF 113 Update: 2022-02-10

[Alexandre PETRESCU <[e-mail]>]

--
Alexandre Petrescu
[e-mail], tél [phone]

Le 23/02/2022 à 16:03, Petr Špaček a écrit :
> On 23. 02. 22 15:07, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>>
>> Le 21/02/2022 à 17:16, Petr Špaček a écrit :
>>> On 21. 02. 22 16:53, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
>>>> On 21/02/2022 15:25, Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>>>>> Without wishing to start a debate, the combination of Mask, 
>>>>> Disinfection,
>>>>> Distancing and Vaccination/Booster is reasonably effective and 
>>>>> easy to do.
>>>>
>>>> agreed.
>>>>
>>>> In theory it would work, but if just 20% of people is doing that in 
>>>> reality -
>>>> then the restrictions doesn't matter anymore.
>>>
>>> Pretty please stop discussing epidemiology on this list.
>>>
>>> IETF is not a group of epidemiology experts.
>>>
>>> If someone on this is interested in effects of non-compliance on 
>>> spread of Covid-19 then please go to scientific sources and read how 
>>> non-compliance is incorporated in epidemiology models and how it 
>>> affects model predictions.
>>
>>
>> I would go look there if you give me a pointer?
>>
>> But, I have some doubt about current epidemiology models because 
>> never have they faced such a large scale.
>>
>> For example, as far as I know in my non-professional knowledge, there 
>> is no spread model for the normal flu, which indeed affects large 
>> populations.
>
> Responded off-list so we can stop discussing it here. Please.


Thank you for the private response.

Alex