IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [113attendees] IETF 113 Update: 2022-02-10

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 23 February 2022 14:07 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0B03A0DE8 for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 06:07:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.046
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.046 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VYngjZhQR9rm for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 06:07:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95F7E3A0DE6 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 06:07:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 21NE7DZw041667 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 15:07:13 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 40B1820539F for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 15:07:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B59205249 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 15:07:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.32.130] (is245935.intra.cea.fr [10.8.32.130]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 21NE7DAu030733 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 15:07:13 +0100
Message-ID: <2b658344-4b09-0e3b-db1d-2c63e8cbfbc6@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 15:07:32 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1
Content-Language: fr
To: 113attendees@ietf.org
References: <9989E0B6-A0F6-4A4C-A681-FDB6C046455D@staff.ietf.org> <718578905.42881.1645007735648@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <07d87027-8162-b421-f157-6fff580d0b8b@go6.si> <26EB1DEC-9132-433B-9F62-F7ECD32C92BE@ietf.org> <673975951.57450.1645180642551@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <f6df5ca5-22f0-6c6e-3872-1ad8b63817a6@go6.si> <1e129ec5-2b83-000e-55fa-035321d34db0@na-nic.com.NA> <bae23e38-d14b-66a6-ebeb-5a4bc80b59e4@go6.si> <44308d8d-7f09-dd4e-a5bd-1495dd90e9d2@isc.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <44308d8d-7f09-dd4e-a5bd-1495dd90e9d2@isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/113attendees/cAGxpWTzPiD9xDZoBduszyTYaU8>
Subject: Re: [113attendees] IETF 113 Update: 2022-02-10
X-BeenThere: 113attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 113 attendees <113attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/113attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:113attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 14:07:18 -0000

Le 21/02/2022 à 17:16, Petr Špaček a écrit :
> On 21. 02. 22 16:53, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
>> On 21/02/2022 15:25, Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>>> Without wishing to start a debate, the combination of Mask, 
>>> Disinfection,
>>> Distancing and Vaccination/Booster is reasonably effective and easy 
>>> to do.
>>
>> agreed.
>>
>> In theory it would work, but if just 20% of people is doing that in 
>> reality -
>> then the restrictions doesn't matter anymore.
>
> Pretty please stop discussing epidemiology on this list.
>
> IETF is not a group of epidemiology experts.
>
> If someone on this is interested in effects of non-compliance on 
> spread of Covid-19 then please go to scientific sources and read how 
> non-compliance is incorporated in epidemiology models and how it 
> affects model predictions.


I would go look there if you give me a pointer?

But, I have some doubt about current epidemiology models because never 
have they faced such a large scale.

For example, as far as I know in my non-professional knowledge, there is 
no spread model for the normal flu, which indeed affects large populations.

Alex

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email