Re: [113attendees] IETF 113 Update: 2022-02-10

[Petr Špaček <[e-mail]>]

On 23. 02. 22 15:07, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
> 
> Le 21/02/2022 à 17:16, Petr Špaček a écrit :
>> On 21. 02. 22 16:53, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
>>> On 21/02/2022 15:25, Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>>>> Without wishing to start a debate, the combination of Mask, 
>>>> Disinfection,
>>>> Distancing and Vaccination/Booster is reasonably effective and easy 
>>>> to do.
>>>
>>> agreed.
>>>
>>> In theory it would work, but if just 20% of people is doing that in 
>>> reality -
>>> then the restrictions doesn't matter anymore.
>>
>> Pretty please stop discussing epidemiology on this list.
>>
>> IETF is not a group of epidemiology experts.
>>
>> If someone on this is interested in effects of non-compliance on 
>> spread of Covid-19 then please go to scientific sources and read how 
>> non-compliance is incorporated in epidemiology models and how it 
>> affects model predictions.
> 
> 
> I would go look there if you give me a pointer?
> 
> But, I have some doubt about current epidemiology models because never 
> have they faced such a large scale.
> 
> For example, as far as I know in my non-professional knowledge, there is 
> no spread model for the normal flu, which indeed affects large populations.

Responded off-list so we can stop discussing it here. Please.

-- 
Petr Špaček