IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 09 October 2019 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE9912012D for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 06:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hubzqEWIkLU3 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 06:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6710212021D for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 06:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F565660169; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:50:43 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FgiDZXKSJtrj; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:50:42 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:1829::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E87C6600AF; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:50:42 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMkAFZW9mWjw92v+OR0Fa8ed+P80yc78eY07hCpsCNY6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 15:50:41 +0200
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1EDDCFC4-02F7-4FE3-A99D-898E067EBF41@piuha.net>
References: <CALaySJLxXVuHQNfTnaeKZ_R9xtBYWfbta+A1bWcE-ZQZwd3VZg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMkAFZW9mWjw92v+OR0Fa8ed+P80yc78eY07hCpsCNY6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/8F-Nba3lMq8DCuW4Y2VVV_Xwd08>
Subject: Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 13:50:47 -0000

(I should acknowledge that the privacy and deployment model related text in Barry’s text was proposal from me. But the whole charter text should be considered as a proposal and subject for discussion and modification.)

Back to Ekr’s point: I do think the technical discovery etc parts are very important and should be worked on. But I also think that we have to say something about privacy, pervasive monitoring and centralisation issues. From my perspective if we work on this topic at all, we’d be not doing our duty if we didn’t consider those aspects.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email