IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 09 October 2019 13:31 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C75D1200C3 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 06:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.478
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.478 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.172, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LoVGDyvS9pz6 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 06:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f45.google.com (mail-io1-f45.google.com [209.85.166.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DB7E1200F7 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 06:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f45.google.com with SMTP id c6so4850581ioo.13 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 06:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lJNetTfp+WPjeFK8WwbtzXp1rBQH+ulYjdpPDdJE3ms=; b=gzuY8NBqLSf9OdFwEaM9D2Q08ALor2BtIJwd+SEWeFBQmKGx7r4FRR9P1pv1CA03Yv zCVO3ba6BW/7i43+lSz+OlwybygmVWYS2XQuN6Gku3CKm+eu7Aol7mWYMNbMnPqSmL6+ oqpwNduwiIb3OdCdRlBFrRngRyJSAk7456jescm/E5cUN7SWRMfXhl+6/h4p6BJuX2yk kEynAPHzdNncCVQ4iOgv/+/ChT3PRBz+GJpMvZoBzITXe92OjoH8yl9TkWyfGpWVbiFV 8SmDXaZz6RPEowDDdhSQfKoZcyK72SUywfFfgDGaXBbxv8i+ceglSZf9p5uPAfY8QJW2 wVfg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWpUsiXiF6kLsDj2Qilk709GZnwgnh7Ewyfvnjn2mXGuG1r5ETB ID7tVf7hUVM9CJ2STcv7N/xpthgb5pVZx1gZceo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxXCbdJQWQVEzHg++V7gjcCa6r1lF7VTDfu0NB6/xRPEfdAXtSNAll/hFuqy069POn3b5ppp7XRQ0Rq01jZoVA=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:2244:: with SMTP id o65mr2999415jao.118.1570627878017; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 06:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJLxXVuHQNfTnaeKZ_R9xtBYWfbta+A1bWcE-ZQZwd3VZg@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Szdm=VEAMOLnuU26aZcs0ppXoenZVPtWY-b40zEtZ5YiA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6Szdm=VEAMOLnuU26aZcs0ppXoenZVPtWY-b40zEtZ5YiA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 15:31:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+r0WAt+=33cV73q88KKc+gj3O6LtfcLxFOhDjcLP+U3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Cc: add@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/KtRpL6cqmeIOVW52wUx87ecgyNQ>
Subject: Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 13:31:21 -0000

> Who wrote the charter? Shouldn’t the BoF proponents be 1-3 individuals, rather than a mailing list?

That's a fair question.  The answers are:

- The IESG write the charter proposal as something to float to the community.

- We took longer than we would have liked to get it done, and we
wanted to be sure we had it ready for discussion as soon as possible,
and to be sure we had a reasonable placeholder for BoF approval
(today).  That was sloppy, and I'm sorry for that, but we also did not
have time to get it socialized and to have people signed up as
proponents and possible chairs yet.

So if it helps, consider "the IESG" as the charter proposal writers
and "5 or 6 ADs" as the BoF proponents.

Barry

On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:55 AM Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 2:39 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> I realize that the charter proposal isn't going to please everyone
>> (and perhaps will please no one), but it's something that, at a first
>> level of review, the IESG accepts and will likely want to move forward
>> with.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Who wrote the charter? Shouldn’t the BoF proponents be 1-3 individuals, rather than a mailing list?
>
> The proposed charter looks extremely misguided to me. But a proposal that no one will put their name on doesn’t even deserve an argument.
>
> thanks,
> Rob
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email