IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Wed, 09 October 2019 08:55 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE391200A3 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 01:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RLxxCmUlIpBa for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 01:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com (mail-io1-xd2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0138F120047 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 01:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2a.google.com with SMTP id w12so3183263iol.11 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 01:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=du0eMFZTaQfoLEivMa4H5kuXwFgL8woIoZWW65OuOSE=; b=n2qvL2pLP4v50zlbYB8LjcN1KnWgyFeMOM81dAa2jkpt83CixPnVGi4tJ242lhSxUt gU1yT4RNkqNcRTOVVfSldeBSls6B1q60Y5Bv8SOCpOZZl8yA0bM2wxzZv8z9DCbLSk4E fF64kIGELlpuGSicXh+981grU+QynLe9cggmWAVn4KllFtjeXwuvZj7vQykVbC5YBvyX AOm+TfzSXumSPD/WNcB97il+QyW8ZF45j+hxL7vT74poYGSzGYAjNPEfmBfLjoDTZFIy qRcRRPIDgbRYs3EzZDEu6QKAYAUCPytf4hvGSDPUJCO/iAivA8LTPNPwN9cmPJcSg647 bsXw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=du0eMFZTaQfoLEivMa4H5kuXwFgL8woIoZWW65OuOSE=; b=f5Vx3kvqQJhGRNXicMtMOKvHley8YuQuJ+Tgx3XLloi3kTomER4VQW8ihxms8AVPA6 Di+clmwpiwzOenxTfV4IcQgZMX0uCP3FkzsEoc+o0wUJ/fYDJgNU2yt1WDfWkz97lcjB Fa1bfX658Gzrdp/2QBm8fKAfJlSwyLWaYRAsZU1pagYcHNq40bLDsfVqTijGHWBGy4c5 06dwhvjv7AyZemJ7yqusdEoMFMUOKCkje0gHHZ6yTAMP3xjNrKbI/xtZ++5CQ1YVaZ9w niARMKWnHq81M00lay/KzIb+bmnpK4KGpSfjsKqngT4b1R7T9tl0XtbB7ObS4glNIEoI gcFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUJQBZgLfLZbarwTtu68llR6sdT1FbXgVgSc23lpKzu+iaOqKem hXNZoqP5d2pHe66ZNXLd5kdttTrM/piSo/DRx6s=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqybuq5uttapVkPFaH5X+GasO1meqPelGgztIpm6Lyyu4nsTkDqaTgXXqfhkWIX3X398pXYwuE1gRgTNz8c8Wuo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:14d:: with SMTP id j13mr2127253ilr.257.1570611298192; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 01:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJLxXVuHQNfTnaeKZ_R9xtBYWfbta+A1bWcE-ZQZwd3VZg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJLxXVuHQNfTnaeKZ_R9xtBYWfbta+A1bWcE-ZQZwd3VZg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 15:54:47 +0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6Szdm=VEAMOLnuU26aZcs0ppXoenZVPtWY-b40zEtZ5YiA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: add@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000082563f05947670d0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/bMdODnGNMC5CWvDWIroRalNh_V0>
Subject: Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 08:55:01 -0000

On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 2:39 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:


> I realize that the charter proposal isn't going to please everyone
> (and perhaps will please no one), but it's something that, at a first
> level of review, the IESG accepts and will likely want to move forward
> with.


Hi,

Who wrote the charter? Shouldn’t the BoF proponents be 1-3 individuals,
rather than a mailing list?

The proposed charter looks extremely misguided to me. But a proposal that
no one will put their name on doesn’t even deserve an argument.

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email