IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 09 October 2019 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFED120840 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 07:21:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gMMEtmduvPlV for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 07:21:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82c.google.com (mail-qt1-x82c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FF3D120821 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 07:21:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82c.google.com with SMTP id u22so3609381qtq.13 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 07:21:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=ro/NYXuajEBsdir7XX/5jhZmoggjamXP/Vzz7toGDM4=; b=yuIBcyqxdX5Ko0kqXqB98XV0jF1GHfVUT/X6Pke/9yUUL6W6LbjsUOycwl1+7TJl4v Eh9l8E558qzelX2rNGSXsqHUv91Gnyg0gPROeYZk2BagUxjxcEA8poF4kg8xAwBxVuXt JtjzTCl2IkZIqwKImRs3Yfb9kNnmaax60qJvSu9KBE2F56rqsCtT4s6oLY+HUb4gmiVc vnB6mjbOryHqGJe3ZY+Hq+bwRv0CBYTY054r8CLw7LhwgG3LALkayT48l9UwAuN+A4OG R6Uj2Qm0SczpYcf20zsH4XKxU5B8/G+pwhJB07658hYGqEAij0jnaua2guMuhvBYjI2I hwzQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=ro/NYXuajEBsdir7XX/5jhZmoggjamXP/Vzz7toGDM4=; b=iaZPVEimbJ5+lhJpnp1E4H8xgByyBfQYcgHeIBbhu+WjJJU9o8ogU4zQPUjKvPihld U2OzB0aSLCU/Ub2G6UKaK6YKdN0Y8zJ4+ZISckjMAsPyuENTmEjhEj7vL0MoF5Vr4nqa 80883m/bBqxK2lhV9pWc5qFX6h0gfz8hYrG3DB/VmxiulV+kdmt1dh3A6YzTUdCer7wK c/9UWAEXYxpj/g4birxLFZ6ovCL4cnTWUemTh8nMCt47AB0H3hxGifH4S5UJGt5rCpv+ s0voFrKpZ+FPbqZ0R49QlS0NOSiHNuwEQcvwZN55QermzRCuVTin6YybV7smzF3exVbv 6MKw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXfiBZuoWvOYpP1rPZbtM8YtaO2q2hoycTQPUAE+xHjFsz39s7j mLx+ZhuBkKpTVrc0smMeVIngIA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz9XAIOzP5FdOdhvbCNb7QYN0VQKCqB2AXrHUUXqJDi2mOD1YCvqdWZRkSuCdkMP93VWv8SFg==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5203:: with SMTP id r3mr3975358qtn.16.1570630899540; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 07:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.10.46] (c-73-186-137-119.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.186.137.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c14sm1171439qta.80.2019.10.09.07.21.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Oct 2019 07:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <3B9A1D39-CCDC-47FE-81C9-37880E2AF7A1@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F48291CD-B70D-4A34-B6A2-A2FCA5A5FF8E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3594.4.13\))
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 10:21:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1EDDCFC4-02F7-4FE3-A99D-898E067EBF41@piuha.net>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
References: <CALaySJLxXVuHQNfTnaeKZ_R9xtBYWfbta+A1bWcE-ZQZwd3VZg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMkAFZW9mWjw92v+OR0Fa8ed+P80yc78eY07hCpsCNY6Q@mail.gmail.com> <1EDDCFC4-02F7-4FE3-A99D-898E067EBF41@piuha.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3594.4.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/ME-6mqgDQHcjQUCCq7Na8WnDj3g>
Subject: Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 14:21:48 -0000

On Oct 9, 2019, at 9:50 AM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:
> But I also think that we have to say something about privacy, pervasive monitoring and centralisation issues. From my perspective if we work on this topic at all, we’d be not doing our duty if we didn’t consider those aspects.

Who is the “we” here, Jari?   If it’s the IAB, then you don’t need a BoF.  Go write down what you think and share it with us as an IAB statement or IAB RFC.  I think this would be a useful thing to do.   But I don’t think there’s a “we” in the IETF that has a consensus position on this, so even if “we” should say something about this, it’s clear to me that there is no something we can agree on that we could say.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email