IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Wed, 09 October 2019 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2481120834 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 14:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.4, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K6-zIXkP8h1z for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 14:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93F9A120058 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 14:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F8EB2420FDE; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 21:35:11 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1910091611240.11081@bofh.nohats.ca>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 22:35:10 +0100
Cc: add@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F01988F4-C1F1-4AAB-B500-DFFAEC5E79EA@rfc1035.com>
References: <CALaySJLxXVuHQNfTnaeKZ_R9xtBYWfbta+A1bWcE-ZQZwd3VZg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMkAFZW9mWjw92v+OR0Fa8ed+P80yc78eY07hCpsCNY6Q@mail.gmail.com> <1556423899.28427.1570640191209@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <CABcZeBNyRDqnVL68aXny=Ht69NjahmS4zRsnYizO53M--rhM5g@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1910091313590.2297@bofh.nohats.ca> <CAFpG3gch-mgJJMO1rEg61PhYNKeKYiJwz4NTQ3QDbEb=WNkyQw@mail.gmail.com> <D6D4836A-C426-491D-AAC4-D1F3323D6AB8@rfc1035.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1910091611240.11081@bofh.nohats.ca>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/rleXDeuzQi7oJKAJ_rds-D7sm9g>
Subject: Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 21:35:16 -0000


> On 9 Oct 2019, at 21:24, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> 
> Why should we do one on eavedropping encrypted DNS?

What part of the proposed charter implies that’s what this new WG would do?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email