IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 10 October 2019 07:17 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8130E120044 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 00:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=ROX3+GCT; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=PVCj65OQ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cw_N6YtPErFR for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 00:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 091A0120033 for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 00:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CF040D; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 03:17:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 03:17:44 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=a 8D8vN41tNDxI2AtWoLIngBg3fbXYxdJL/apNSZJ464=; b=ROX3+GCTO5nEi/1Rk q6zXyb2GkKMIP1g46ls3egxCuUhXuMCG6pxSFmjJjfL3qeMUyYW+cjYXg0ZAariJ eP58Xg5B7G2xHE4sacuagTFrr2WiAi6efrIRViJhZhU4X2E8xw+ViMV9/phLz9ms 6qktXDIfXe1D6/YUTIX7bSkxoyaSUiZVy0RghhQY2W8GiJ9EGVD/qLq9lx3PhcIO FAiHlDtR//C8HH3tm18B9sGkDz+I8vclWjdF029zBxQ3AoruiG+Y8+yAMiXMCAsI xAW+PLAEGAK+hoVlgPicZ9EZOMSkhsUqy+ogC6DeoluSar9S0a3+ECfttCf1iHA1 j5FGQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=a8D8vN41tNDxI2AtWoLIngBg3fbXYxdJL/apNSZJ4 64=; b=PVCj65OQkIbc5L0iiW2XMxTYLIQrTWvuC9dQ3KpeCv3JOwB2jvnFSg+Id PIXm9+ftGWj/2xIj/bfdu3L5y0jf9CI4PkK3FWQnArec69HgPfd3zz19e045D/hi l+JATC+wbDA3cpk7aUIZ1/9O015Yt6dvy0ovPG6X/rHAvKM1aIhVkvM4c9Pe45fK QVT7MiJd1+zjnxMzYNl73pXJfyQcXfTaS7IvN6NEwB9WySN6ZquInvxlI9WN6VvZ 1d/4WaQcVSygiVIZ93cYrKZZ+Ycq33tJp0EBXE6nklGWqplRXrUXB4E1lP1KHR99 Tpl+/BAHkOJOwVdQ1dYjRnYJVXwMA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:F9ueXXLBGYh2TL6SnOEzHH7UmEmOMGfCA_KyUcIaN3vRKq1zrAEm1g>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedriedvgdduvddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtjeenucfhrhhomheptehlihhs shgrucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucffohhmrg hinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppedvudejrddugeelrddufeehrddujeehnecurfgr rhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnnecuvehluh hsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:F9ueXWDTrrUMTohp2a6_VLPDkEczIaBeWKyYpPL2N_TKuDz8CXzEgA> <xmx:F9ueXXgAB-2i_k_9i6Ft-er-3YOi2INr5jZsgHkOZw4AcKHxWUh-KA> <xmx:F9ueXekQ8SLQe1KN_mzTKFNA_D56pfPkCI6CpROJgUEJHWrgA2cfrw> <xmx:F9ueXZg1vInlfDomvWhb5rdqYNRL4pNMhyiaVJFadzaD1OFRfc7UAw>
Received: from [172.35.0.75] (unknown [217.149.135.175]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0578BD60063; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 03:17:42 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <A904161A-1B02-4A9E-8AA2-D2CC0FEA6A07@rfc1035.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 09:17:41 +0200
Cc: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, add@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <92EE71EA-48B5-4292-A290-80D7A9F9BFA8@cooperw.in>
References: <CALaySJLxXVuHQNfTnaeKZ_R9xtBYWfbta+A1bWcE-ZQZwd3VZg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMkAFZW9mWjw92v+OR0Fa8ed+P80yc78eY07hCpsCNY6Q@mail.gmail.com> <1556423899.28427.1570640191209@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <CABcZeBNyRDqnVL68aXny=Ht69NjahmS4zRsnYizO53M--rhM5g@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1910091313590.2297@bofh.nohats.ca> <CAFpG3gch-mgJJMO1rEg61PhYNKeKYiJwz4NTQ3QDbEb=WNkyQw@mail.gmail.com> <D6D4836A-C426-491D-AAC4-D1F3323D6AB8@rfc1035.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1910091611240.11081@bofh.nohats.ca> <A904161A-1B02-4A9E-8AA2-D2CC0FEA6A07@rfc1035.com>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/N9Q3P89WSnR5QA3SOAhsI8eVeFI>
Subject: Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:17:46 -0000

Hi Jim,

> On Oct 9, 2019, at 11:46 PM, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 9 Oct 2019, at 21:24, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
>> 
>> It is relevant, because if we believe the only thing that is needed is
>> a DHCP option, then we do not need to spin up a working group.
> 
> Well the draft charter says:
> 
> Specific initial areas of focus include but are not limited to:
> 
> - Resolver discovery and selection
> - Expression of resolver policy
> - Support for split-horizon DNS environments
> - Mechanisms to facilitate testing of new configurations

This was actually in some draft text I originally generated that led to the version Barry eventually shared with the list, but this text itself doesn’t exist in the version that appears at <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki>. 

Alissa

> 
> Only the first item on that list looks is if it could somehow touch on DHCP. And even then it might only have an impact on DHCP if the current discovery draft in the doh WG fails to deliver. So no, a DHCP option is not the only thing that’s needed IMO.
> 
> I would also hope we can agree to take an objective, evidence-based approach rather than one which is based on subjective matters of belief.
> 
> -- 
> Add mailing list
> Add@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email