IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Thu, 10 October 2019 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C72E1200B1 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OLiX0-BxA7Zr for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F18E712002E for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id q1so14355522ion.1 for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=c1mNho29FmI5E82fVx24gQu0zecp9uYUhNqUn7WSJgM=; b=sPWppXqUuQRPzQTt+BZ5biJC85bdA6hxexLrJWQBbljRnBbcqziNr84BW8++qbO/P0 DdOCezkBH+pErb9jZeXe/0zaC+H635XWjAupCUuY87Qj4jV9AUn4nImGaSRoSOLMBGDi cZphbXNA/i01nAwNe+lf31drBc/kULtZS0+CLhuakoSedAqvp1e9RqtDwofrjX10SQAc cfi84ntBoHD3Oqt6tpniWXbSItGWLXBaJXH5mXthrJUZtZvOQYw8jdhE6tH7h45IpraO sFN5RqdKfQtfIhjcfpC+AasobZTXLeZ/lRT27ehnCMoWYucYAEgIJD5I4LPB6aOxIE8l 2vmQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=c1mNho29FmI5E82fVx24gQu0zecp9uYUhNqUn7WSJgM=; b=cRoQkXzNKK15MU1loZW1MkIJiwhwK4vCGadurlmB6p+aVyjm3rnDgI/C1RVMe7hSY7 H5PLe/X0idYfuugPeu+53oNG8tqAFiX6LPYLVK6jvNc9cu0mbVkVR2k7fTb0XnVoHNey fQyqO9EkKcB8WHr6MyI8/AjfPhH8XNzM31uDQcolATSNC75RvXxPsTamdYzX75XFmBD1 gAMWkh7Ovo/IB8kS7PH5iK/d/AphEG7/SKK4qMiEPrLkeNk435HTQrSncrcBiGOG+Uw/ Cc7i++WFGsWimDW/1MDWaCcVqfDfCr8vc5TfTbubDsrNQo84hTSn/Mvl4TWI3kl8IRAE wwxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX4aN5tfsMttgxyeSixGSkWOASwJg3QEhlZsgZlmkYkHvE193Gv PekN+GXP+6HxwMrMSkkl6Pdf+Drt4XQecRzrZxA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzM+CVO68UU0qMErsPNj9gbB7jHtUYtUDdkZUT14GUz9IKZtXN0AVr81ZG0ajdLlDg13SD6p2+gAd6H9D2gQyU=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:e910:: with SMTP id u16mr11138296iof.196.1570718893163; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJLxXVuHQNfTnaeKZ_R9xtBYWfbta+A1bWcE-ZQZwd3VZg@mail.gmail.com> <4050.1570707771@dooku.sandelman.ca> <CALaySJ+6CwsDCkbT+hRrtmZjvmmfmVhVLeF=wS0WB2HHOKuebQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJKVeKE3AjJWgV0rgWs_JavjcFMsoodbnUYr75+Tug14nw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJKVeKE3AjJWgV0rgWs_JavjcFMsoodbnUYr75+Tug14nw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 21:48:01 +0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SzWwYK_iST0+Qt8RQz-i0ZjO5CuhjKjYOqR8X63-C5BOA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ab4f8d05948f7d68"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/k8NGQwio6gJKXEOU0bgKh7glHHs>
Subject: Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 14:48:16 -0000

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 7:08 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:

> For that matter, even having a BoF in Singapore isn't set in stone: if
> you, the community, think we've erred in assuming that a BoF now is
> the best approach, and we get rough consensus on that, we can easily
> cancel the BoF between now and then.
>

These two drafts seem well-intentioned:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pauly-dprive-adaptive-dns-privacy-00
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh-00

Why not just handle them in the DPRIVE WG?

I don't think a 200-person BoF in Singapore will get a better result.

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email