IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Wed, 09 October 2019 13:48 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A88120115 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 06:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hopcount.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eZgIAf6TbIpl for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 06:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B615312011F for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 06:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id z19so5173254ior.0 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 06:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=baTsDkuVf31r9Wpfh4i2U+iOycMmSyHA6SZCeAe2a1Y=; b=D6wuVeP3R73uNzQzaeITDkvqa1gN+WpjHYpOjrPRqfVAwtVYzcowIcxXUY4ee2Ho0u A/M2kYmkLbUnXFoO9a1tyr/Eyq0Q9rI39VJ9bA7FSU5/vKjhuqQ+sUc/MakrBH5MupH7 GGj5qwYC6me853xuqaIs5zYHqei9Ba9v7IBeI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=baTsDkuVf31r9Wpfh4i2U+iOycMmSyHA6SZCeAe2a1Y=; b=i3wBYf4pSwNa7dbRpeG1dSOuODWHDQFIdyZa/8wQiIuJofJSZVjydq5QQZG13aABiy upxf/E5nSX1GTuzrVHsloUI1YWyIO8XBF7PPORK3H3x6aH0lJulcD02MLIEUVS/VdUq/ iiTnz/3KKfvYyaTnkpkVEv/SWldgyJIxt0fiC9ai4D+6tCH0Bt6AgIRsjFKT+zEzw+Cy t6C1PwZ+EKiQGoJ+jORMyZMft7r16iX5vWTj+lUJ2ivieMY1Tz+nHPfpRaHGL4kDvRoH +7XC1w6yUO9v4PbRfNe6p8SaJX1+0aWeaAX7VY0VcL3fL1knKijYX4QmyPV/nqxQOfam vsxw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWQ0lBpm9sEqokw10CN5FSkqzDpGNSlRNUsnKNyCpGV15rm/8yt Yn8K0KwF/py9q7iZXaRPPbHcF7LWV/egXZ6g
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx4Bx14HAtQlKNIjIKjuzVekd/yKOUe/UrG9VEwnu/BpvhsYMelsI2+12/a9Rd0aX0KjBN7qQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6f0b:: with SMTP id k11mr3260590ioc.243.1570628926821; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 06:48:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2607:f2c0:e786:128f:9040:dbfa:a425:dac9? ([2607:f2c0:e786:128f:9040:dbfa:a425:dac9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 197sm1006325ioc.78.2019.10.09.06.48.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Oct 2019 06:48:46 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3594.4.19\))
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6Sx2Yh7BecWw-Q=QrD1WchL0jTj7gzCnr-B-N=04WmV7RQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 09:48:44 -0400
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <C9D02221-0B92-4458-8A93-1DE880FDD638@hopcount.ca>
References: <CALaySJLxXVuHQNfTnaeKZ_R9xtBYWfbta+A1bWcE-ZQZwd3VZg@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Szdm=VEAMOLnuU26aZcs0ppXoenZVPtWY-b40zEtZ5YiA@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+r0WAt+=33cV73q88KKc+gj3O6LtfcLxFOhDjcLP+U3A@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sx2Yh7BecWw-Q=QrD1WchL0jTj7gzCnr-B-N=04WmV7RQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3594.4.19)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/JTrayPUSV5fsvlI82D6t9BRG4O8>
Subject: Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 13:48:49 -0000

Hi Rob,

On 9 Oct 2019, at 09:40, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:

>> So if it helps, consider "the IESG" as the charter proposal writers
>> and "5 or 6 ADs" as the BoF proponents.
> 
> It does not help. Could those "5 or 6 ADs" put their names on the proposal?

Can you explain why this is important?

I don't mean to imply it's not; I'm just trying to understand your question.


Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email