IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 10 October 2019 11:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99CC6120C1D for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 04:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aaof-7CXtDC5 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 04:42:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E448120C0A for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 04:42:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (business-178-015-097-209.static.arcor-ip.net [178.15.97.209]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C6EB1F456; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:42:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id DE0B0346B; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 13:42:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, add@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <CALaySJLxXVuHQNfTnaeKZ_R9xtBYWfbta+A1bWcE-ZQZwd3VZg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALaySJLxXVuHQNfTnaeKZ_R9xtBYWfbta+A1bWcE-ZQZwd3VZg@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> message dated "Wed, 09 Oct 2019 09:38:37 +0200."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 13:42:51 +0200
Message-ID: <4050.1570707771@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/loqOeJ-oTDS31NljOJ2w-DTzeiQ>
Subject: Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:42:08 -0000

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
    > The IESG has worked up a proposal for a possible working group, which
    > we're tentatively calling "ABCD", for "Application Behavior Considering
    > DNS".  We can discuss the charter proposal here, and expect to approve
    > a working-group-forming BoF for Singapore.

    > I realize that the charter proposal isn't going to please everyone (and
    > perhaps will please no one), but it's something that, at a first level
    > of review, the IESG accepts and will likely want to move forward with.

Let me reply here before having read the thread.

My impression is that ABCD will act as an architecture group for the problem
with DNSOP (OPS Area), DPRIVE (INT Area), and DOH (ART area) providing
specific technologies.

It seems that many of the discovery/configuration protocols which are
appearing in DPRIVE from Tiru/Dan/me, and Tommy and Thomas would fit into
ABCD rather than DPRIVE.

Please confirm that this is your intention?

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email