IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Wed, 09 October 2019 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CB612011D for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 06:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eKpshMMKrE3l for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 06:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 628DA120115 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 06:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id v2so5057115iob.10 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 06:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ptLLPdiurEBGyPP1Wcxu/aGHUXKOPnCCpY738uiJgXY=; b=AF1tZfILwwoMX0SQB9i55+ux1QX/G3lrX9XngqdSxXBxd2c6XkCPtH7Ld66ADluXJZ JBR2CYVQtkKuM3jyruchSPiUN4tbb2oFYUtHVPoIUfM7h1QCeXyGtaPOqQOc7vCdPwNB eHxiAYou/CWbereu56hKd0cQ2pzvPZR4Oz2WHZmxpKUP/xdPQFSpKvtjS+rE+z41VoZy YZKmJgumxwy3986xJ39yUBO8SWu1OF8VKKIY6pfMtAl1eHf/Ci/AkPIcD+UKjVjeQItW 9ENTU8HPBjLRFV+K4V/jQ811gjLxjSV1b1GP0xYlNTijm5EFIIJR1llOfo7AMBNbVPdY 2UnQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ptLLPdiurEBGyPP1Wcxu/aGHUXKOPnCCpY738uiJgXY=; b=h464yUro4Zueo6W4XdSYtaLoHyC8PueLtGVtyxhERST27MIzLix/SVAH0Wuhuu9dXy ML9bLdxg/MDoMvvT7aTJ0oh5OO0yZaGeeqFpC2yhhh5z51LkZgCECIu+2xKM7ouHFrXs jS5XzQOjxweRU4QCXqeLmtEPq9o1sLtJKmzl48Ak8uAHIvdjiKxZH38rKXQsQvMFy2AH xUamg2pR7Aivagx1J99K1HsmxNV6Xy/x5DO0lfwAFsZDfvsqHFQzTWs7US1kxCCvH2bv Ij474moTtATQSCVjf++p/Fiy1N8WFPqAWqbKOzvGAm8xAkHXyzb6et4llbprOP3Br1PN 8AKA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVQx86hGGLDSAOp4M2fpoyXKM4nZIWbn/BKJ/dI6fgPt+hvFfVq pG8JOYjjCiYwTRNcXoIqFD2mydqQ8nGrsV/8PoI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxPg3jZym8h6KDIr4shMy6D+OjMuH0tWMs3EmDugzKHCLLnAJn6Yv7GcZ50B0xrwuZj6xhUgK0cYQHGyW9SMf4=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8f83:: with SMTP id l3mr3422481iol.73.1570629120692; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 06:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJLxXVuHQNfTnaeKZ_R9xtBYWfbta+A1bWcE-ZQZwd3VZg@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Szdm=VEAMOLnuU26aZcs0ppXoenZVPtWY-b40zEtZ5YiA@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+r0WAt+=33cV73q88KKc+gj3O6LtfcLxFOhDjcLP+U3A@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sx2Yh7BecWw-Q=QrD1WchL0jTj7gzCnr-B-N=04WmV7RQ@mail.gmail.com> <C9D02221-0B92-4458-8A93-1DE880FDD638@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <C9D02221-0B92-4458-8A93-1DE880FDD638@hopcount.ca>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 20:51:43 +0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SyhEQLvm8ddgb1HxfqD4Ru_gVajduVggVA=4O5U5ytRcA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d01a3b05947a96f3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/WbLu7Pe0RqC1GDC4bKXhuS3IAh8>
Subject: Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 13:52:03 -0000

On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 8:48 PM Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote:

> Hi Rob,
>
> On 9 Oct 2019, at 09:40, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> So if it helps, consider "the IESG" as the charter proposal writers
> >> and "5 or 6 ADs" as the BoF proponents.
> >
> > It does not help. Could those "5 or 6 ADs" put their names on the
> proposal?
>
> Can you explain why this is important?
>
> I don't mean to imply it's not; I'm just trying to understand your
> question.
>

You ask a totally fair question.

I think the charter is misguided and wrote that "a proposal that no one
will put their name on doesn’t even deserve an argument."

So, I just asked (again) whether someone would put their name on it.

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email