IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106

tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com> Thu, 10 October 2019 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <kondtir@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214E812008B for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 08:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PvGNC2pj6sWs for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 08:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AB5012001A for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 08:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id n197so14440188iod.9 for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 08:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=c6zg5+G+Tc+o/gGRENKli7vk8BsiWwMpODmmyl1+dsQ=; b=BYiyVkMYA9RGviC8STxgiqOZ5Vq59lnCPBo98Ym4dC0rYI7kK0Ogc47z3GgYKIoJ4u UVrqLcB1WmephHbGjPhGV1/Y0Ef/wsH9KfgKKbBmNaGPt6PTNfsQLps/0wwLRxMNioUi AnmfPvI/auCHcoTyxb4lIcaBbIcTIqUdKsS39keR+XVgvcbmfB7jhZHMQQrkGJjCzMHL 6VirwLaTweTSMokAseEYWrGRUIMJA9UYUQI0D52fLNz2OgPkaadjk2Yfsb7wAQ+Akds2 GiYFlkrcodiTu6fKDiEyzGKjBBCXu2zrKIpw2+ZgQuiYWwtbMDqzMBmZRNG44/uxXNFR u2Lw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=c6zg5+G+Tc+o/gGRENKli7vk8BsiWwMpODmmyl1+dsQ=; b=MhBCJeTjkruLRSa7LhqEZODkYt3Ce4z1owniivKZ7fBD9eMKw9erc6OR6kqYkiAKRA d2bS0tNxRvGh0ZOhEKrq3MDyCjo6UhYekWZhq/qa2FFwY+o911tUNaOeGo0D3HjQ31r4 uWHNI77hY2IdpXYMKBYUu7h8tq10IJkznWt1Tf+xxTOiiVmAM0b7x6IdSl6XTPZvunCY 8+v7BdB7sPlcvwtGvn/5enWpa0PGT31tOsrsV88gSY7H6iU97a7+WFDI5Pwbh25oubj7 iPv44MeuQYzLuod/GOQ9XvpriuObXceqgJi3Hz6H0T0OHrnB1ruP9f2lDBkNx7rsf7Wn At2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWpK6Pnm2aS/KZdr9z/L550FTVha8RdF62uzbohxsVzW24V8KOT TWsU2Z+yhyWj7SkkOBQGaS9Er5w4AvxneJ9eKbA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxAMYhS6/vB4kSLtDVPBYKrrS/AF5xZHbZj+4LPnoSfMOrR+kYm8a9Zzu2LWJ25eQqO4k/ukDWV0LKvVVgU1DQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:e605:: with SMTP id g5mr671663ioh.298.1570720357316; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 08:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJLxXVuHQNfTnaeKZ_R9xtBYWfbta+A1bWcE-ZQZwd3VZg@mail.gmail.com> <4050.1570707771@dooku.sandelman.ca> <CALaySJ+6CwsDCkbT+hRrtmZjvmmfmVhVLeF=wS0WB2HHOKuebQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJKVeKE3AjJWgV0rgWs_JavjcFMsoodbnUYr75+Tug14nw@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SzWwYK_iST0+Qt8RQz-i0ZjO5CuhjKjYOqR8X63-C5BOA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SzWwYK_iST0+Qt8RQz-i0ZjO5CuhjKjYOqR8X63-C5BOA@mail.gmail.com>
From: tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 16:12:24 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFpG3gdXJYmyPem5nJYxzkFqpDQh8VSv=m7pwu7yaM8bn-Sn9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f0835b05948fd482"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/c0S-IcenE8PNgb_5wrTce0lSlUc>
Subject: Re: [Add] Proposed charter and BoF request for IETF 106
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:12:41 -0000

On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 15:48, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 7:08 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
> wrote:
>
>> For that matter, even having a BoF in Singapore isn't set in stone: if
>> you, the community, think we've erred in assuming that a BoF now is
>> the best approach, and we get rough consensus on that, we can easily
>> cancel the BoF between now and then.
>>
>
> These two drafts seem well-intentioned:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pauly-dprive-adaptive-dns-privacy-00
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh-00
>
> Why not just handle them in the DPRIVE WG?
>

There are several other drafts:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-information-00
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-reddy-dprive-bootstrap-dns-server-05
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-peterson-dot-dhcp-01
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-reddy-dprive-dprive-privacy-policy-00

-Tiru


>
> I don't think a 200-person BoF in Singapore will get a better result.
>
> thanks,
> Rob
> --
> Add mailing list
> Add@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email