Re: [Diversity] Participation in active IETF work (was: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration)

SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 20 April 2016 06:51 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26A212E245 for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 23:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=dlI9Kxcf; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=resistor.net header.b=vipsh6fr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wi3DZAF-tr2e for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 23:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D7912E19E for <diversity@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 23:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u3K6plc5013817 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 19 Apr 2016 23:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1461135113; x=1461221513; bh=B/2iNfbzevv5tlLCwHvUK8EFupXJko5mlym3m6jBXP0=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=dlI9Kxcf0ma/vhpAYrZPz4Z+1Ec3kk4WRRaJjHOVe8pJTZV+UAQn7+ncehLlTvoeD 82+oC+7lSHTRUOudYm1anHS8+UHpQCQouH0RLS2GUxvZiVMkvPHsNwGZTG6QATuplO 0MoLGwyyGqVeqbW+CyvJsoyzXaf+kAYwwaMjzvok=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1461135113; x=1461221513; i=@resistor.net; bh=B/2iNfbzevv5tlLCwHvUK8EFupXJko5mlym3m6jBXP0=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=vipsh6frKc8dws3129INt6/FXhlbZTCxrLHjMMAwIpjSzvlYgyNcwdnWq00Uhp+97 7MPXHXZNSI1J7ztxc4iguY0olO+EBi/GRGUOqLKW6UemThvE3+tGWfaGYYe7lutPva ll2606m0GCDDJkbrr1/CxuQIvsa5hSMVeMDVEPfk=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20160419174939.0e7c4fd0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:37:36 -0700
To: Vinayak Hegde <vinayakh@gmail.com>, diversity@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAKe6YvMfsnF8ViA=mjFkE4b-Z=ZWwYzyPs3oE4_h9nv8EdB9zQ@mail.g mail.com>
References: <57151C55.30206@gmail.com> <746128222.2295531.1461009032633.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160418172423.1071c670@resistor.net> <CAKe6YvOr46TT+sdrgmLA1mpqpFsDDkyLQS=XA21RD+bSfd4G4A@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160419082036.0eadf038@resistor.net> <CAKe6YvPG1u_gDdib692M78pYPHqLLhReSr9K00q6GL7y7GVyrA@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160419123834.10702b38@resistor.net> <CAKe6YvMfsnF8ViA=mjFkE4b-Z=ZWwYzyPs3oE4_h9nv8EdB9zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/diversity/Iohr3bML8yP5lP5PePMJmqGkoZY>
Subject: Re: [Diversity] Participation in active IETF work (was: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration)
X-BeenThere: diversity@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diversity open mailing list <diversity.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/diversity/>
List-Post: <mailto:diversity@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 06:51:58 -0000

Hi Vinayak,
At 13:43 19-04-2016, Vinayak Hegde wrote:
>Nope I am arguing the opposite. But I am saying it is becoming easier
>to contribute remotely (if you have attended a few meetings or sometimes
>even if you haven't).

Sorry about that.

If I were to say: non-participation from developing countries (or 
non-participation from people who do not work for large companies) 
affects IETF work, I would be asked how that affects IETF work.

Regards,
-sm