Re: [Diversity] early mentoring for /any/ draft (was - Re: [Mentoring-coordinators] Participation in active IETF work)

<> Wed, 20 April 2016 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321FF12F048 for <>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:21:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KbRP24fEyxlX for <>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F95212EF8D for <>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=s2048; t=1461165387; bh=x2rqQ1kiJhr89jRIy115ozSEE9UkdKp37ZGATxW0yNw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=UR6ErmDSNguN3q7anx1GLumfDvcwYdxh2jPzkwtSyPI9J0XAg+ixX3JUGc68dEUVIYt4L1zhgfwVkqLZAwXIdxRfqqwvDUTq1xwBTw/OotxMnS2xKXYGrzoMZPsycgcTLcMqroOfL20nfIrlfvn42yHvTI7kVIPYVIkcgB+QMte5xnC3ktScYCrD/HvpzIGq2/oMcTaykwFQM749Bi86xTvaoiG8V2FzVlV860PyQMcdNnbtQELGmEJEGY/AGtSFLm5NEULv7u1hce4O0P208VEdHBO2irgX+nspsDXanUtutyNNwT/mrwTYB8JjM1NOh2ufyyQXu8Pqk1EBUfBnGA==
Received: from [] by with NNFMP; 20 Apr 2016 15:16:27 -0000
Received: from [] by with NNFMP; 20 Apr 2016 15:16:27 -0000
Received: from [] by with NNFMP; 20 Apr 2016 15:16:27 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: 4qJMx3QVM1lht.OWWIgmL4ekKq4Ijv76tbCyTMUbz5rkonSptVydLSbYcgIJZHV rWewcCDJP39V0AwuP7sN.G6abhZbbQJfGwVDTu07yW0R37tPtAHM8.ajZ1cB_U8rZ085QU6aUFJ_ tByngGOt61doAIDWl9EJ5LRwD8G3mkyq3IAgHliEs7xiJTXqKrEJ.EIQT5SUjgzZaHwThlt41.Tt 3dSSh1hX7O8HuSAaFCMI.c_q7rzd.eGaimlngZcWTmEyBZUU3pJxFWAAoE._x2F36cD1qajxc6z0 XFSfNdYMh.SJMhV6SdG3TqGqoDnS7vUDTFNz1xgeBOcuTa5FT9oovLpVzR7qVMJ7u9IUakctIoA2 A4bYvocx7xDkhlc7ZKygfYcz13oN8coLANXQF9mMlQdOCFUguBffAdaVEAcw_lUiB1qrTDlk1BjQ 329icuPbHC7FNq5Z4CxhWHxETd4rodHXg68aNaIFlMTBHAIPXx6J5K6keHs2WqwYI62Ae7.oXkJj vLWOOXN19cEjcGbc6hXnPxOw1d0ZOi5aJ
Received: by; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 15:16:27 +0000
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 15:16:26 +0000 (UTC)
From: <>
To: Abdussalam Baryun <>
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>, "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [Diversity] early mentoring for /any/ draft (was - Re: [Mentoring-coordinators] Participation in active IETF work)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diversity open mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 15:21:40 -0000

>I agree with you, but I will add that there are many people want to participate in IDs but there are problems with some of the WG culture, no secret. So The is a language of argument and >discussion that new people may not get use to, which is needed in such WG culture.


Yes, the IETF culture has its strengths and drawbacks.  In fact, you may want to take a look at:

This is a presentation that we have started doing for new people at IETF.  It seems to have been quite well received.  So far, I am talking to people from Japan, China, & Latin America to translate into their own languages.  

You may also wish to look at:

I suspect that the discussion style of "very frank" feedback may be what you are referring to?  Am I correct?

If I might, the goal of discussions is to have the best engineering solution come out.  And, I know sometimes people get passionate in their arguments and give feedback maybe a bit more directly than is considered normal in a number of cultures.

In my opinion, passion is good.   We need to care and care a LOT about what we do.  That is what will make the work good.

Definitely, people need to be kinder and more sensitive in how they give their feedback.  Is this what you are talking about?

I wonder if we should have mentoring workshops on "How to Give and Receive Feedback".    Just trying to get from you what you are thinking.


On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:52 PM, <> wrote:

>On 4/19/2016 9:35 AM, wrote:
>>> think you are right on all counts.  I have seen some very horrible prose
>>> from native English speakers.
>>> But, the mentoring program is not just for non-native English speakers.
>>>   It is for all IETFers.
>>There is an appealingly subversive possibility in this:  Getting 
>>"outside" people to review work much earlier in its lifecycle.  We have 
>>long lamented the fact that we do reviews late in the cycle, after a 
>>great deal of energy has been expended and people have become 
>>entrenched.  Getting others to review the work early it its development 
>>could do considerably more than improve its writing...
>The mentoring initiative I want to start after Berlin is for people to solicit a team to work with them to co-author a draft.  That is, person x has an idea (but no draft), he / she gets 5 minutes & 2 foils to present the idea in a webinar.   Others on the webinar ask questions for another 5-10 minutes.   Then, if people would like, they can tell person x that they would be interested in being a co-author.
>If person x gets no takers as far as co-authors, he / she may wish to draw the inevitable conclusion.
>Of course, if person x feels that they have not fairly represented themselves, they can have a second chance.  But, after the second time, and still no takers ....
>BTW, no third chances.
>diversity mailing list

diversity mailing list