IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Diversity] Participation in active IETF work (was: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration)

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 19 April 2016 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A71712E6D1; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u6NYDeHrsu9o; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 041EC12E633; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u3JEUvRi014903 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:30:57 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
References: <CAKKJt-dS_XE9AX8kKJa1wndVk_V9swtkN3NR-AyzwJMp2+X13g@mail.gmail.com> <1387245435.2572474.1461075646671.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
To: nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <5716411B.7070206@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:30:51 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1387245435.2572474.1461075646671.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/diversity/Zvm75Y6grE3qfye26fbFezn1TUs>
Cc: "diversity@ietf.org" <diversity@ietf.org>, "mentoring-coordinators@ietf.org" <mentoring-coordinators@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Diversity] Participation in active IETF work (was: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration)
X-BeenThere: diversity@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: Diversity open mailing list <diversity.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/diversity/>
List-Post: <mailto:diversity@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:31:00 -0000

On 4/19/2016 7:20 AM, nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com wrote:
> 1.  Internet draft review teams (already started)
..
> 3.  Internet draft critique teams (will start time after next!)  Help
> people who have a draft make it better.


Nalini,

Can you clarify the difference between these two activities?  In the 
IETF, 'review' usually involves critical analysis.

My guess is that you intend the two efforts to come at different times 
and to have people who differ in their relationship to the document 
development process.  But that's just a guess and it's not very specific.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email