Re: [Diversity] Participation in active IETF work (was: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration)

Abdussalam Baryun <> Wed, 20 April 2016 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B23312B006 for <>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4hVJeoRHey0b for <>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0B2512D5C9 for <>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id f74so26683299qge.2 for <>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=5GgA6D1UKt08DZUJtiPDPr3F+hf2lXePNU8OSZJS0vM=; b=RbbTYQNX/Vbf7nznIhQGGM7e7rcT8M9lDR2wDB64hTOQM4yyIsFjNgzdj+gKX6/3If +1nBZtugzPrO41H8WY0CvbMBIBjX7jZFlO+DywsHLktJ6q9pwSU4BpsRGPsLAAAS7MDh 2We7B85huBgXIzIzO5toYEM5b/IiiBtNHCq2mFLyR8wBj75gLidMupzqp4RrQzmWZCN2 C5FpCEcJX2WMNRFVsPJWq2oJtsl3DTfajMCnx+v/UBEDWiJSGFIZRAfU+wYnrNqLpGkg l+V/fjbMJ/98zvShDfzePaOFy0XRvGJulrMz8DcsG8OmNRrfvSPYEmLmkTtlscP4QbF/ /ArA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=5GgA6D1UKt08DZUJtiPDPr3F+hf2lXePNU8OSZJS0vM=; b=dXCx6wXps5VWkGiXaQDshiizyQPdIBKhZYX2bQyvufdN285xokRi5z6jW0VaZpBEXu EdTOkb1QHyjLNduulZQYepEB7Ng1wqSeqww2zieW+Njdql9q/8VZha6HXWuJFV8vw5Sh Ra+WBsbApJXUhFtQWe9U0Lj+9en9i0N1Z5s62UH+NyQACG+FsR+eojmmS6aYpFC6tU9n 5qdOEJW84w8EWhkC5zc3SIPw5R4KavxbYm81VJaRKv6NerU8SPioss/UHx7LDVbmlUXf D65HrTJ/EhkhjPdlWEEdIKO00l2Nx4jHO8l9SBbJy1TpIkdQr9on/kdVkW0euhxeLC2K raiA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWvEx1xFiv50Bkfuf7jqZWMwDTT+wN2I33fjCp8dqRa7GeYnqdrNYlsgI35cGWxHIpk9SMYrd1v1M0SGw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by with SMTP id m106mr11129447qgm.13.1461164359160; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with HTTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:59:19 +0200
Message-ID: <>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <>
To: SM <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c038e0961f920530ebd6b4
Archived-At: <>
Cc: Hui Deng <>, Dhruv Dhody <>,, "" <>, Christian O'Flaherty <>, Alvaro Retana <>, Vinayak Hegde <>
Subject: Re: [Diversity] Participation in active IETF work (was: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diversity open mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 14:59:26 -0000

Hi SM,

Thanks for your email. My opinion is that the IETF needs to work harder on
these issues. IMHO, the problem is mainly that mentors are still in few
numbers, and the IETF needs to look into the IETF culture or better to say
their WG culture. I recommend we need one or two mentors for each WG, so
the mentor MUST not be the Chair or AD, the mentor MUST be a participant in
that WG (better if he/she was a Chair before).


On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:58 AM, SM <> wrote:

> Hi Nalini,
> At 12:50 18-04-2016, wrote:
>> I wonder if there has not been more participation in active IETF work
>> before from other regions because there was no structured way to start
>> participating and language insensitivity.  (BTW, there is a new member of
>> the Mentoring Team from Latin America, that I met in Buenos Aires who will
>> translate the Mentoring emails into Spanish.)
> Attendance figures were used as a substitute for Participation figures.
> The IETF Community did not show much interest in doing anything about
> that.  A few years ago, an IAOC Chair posted the following to justify the
> meeting policy:
> There wasn't any formal effort (as the one you are doing) to train people
> from other regions to start participating except for the meeting training
> sessions.  A person who is not used to discussing in English faces a higher
> learning curve in comparison with someone from Australia.
> The regional mentors (in the Cc) might be able to comment about why there
> has not been more active participation before.
> Regards,
> -sm
> _______________________________________________
> diversity mailing list