IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops are a problem

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Mon, 01 February 2021 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152313A1386 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:16:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6NNgC0ptYW6L for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:16:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com (mail-pg1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 862CF3A1384 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:16:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id i7so12610640pgc.8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:16:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc.com; s=fluffulence; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=5o57IoxtuodcfeCyYenDnPP8SlHqlbhMDuWTVrcpAQo=; b=WQezF4/X+5AqUdMVWwS9lUKbkX0/HYQ3VnhB1bOrWT+cd3fzoCB2UebejljU+3FX6X 5PKGZP3/kytsfGaG6SziF5ZuVh6qCe7UY9fndEEFDNpUUPSWMfQmGXamBn1sAzRjCLWt lOimQXz3eLmyoPSmbSczHHprc7U5DoN0ysL8NzDUYqLujBiJjt+lhQ80RUziW2j5PQgB bZjuhO0glI7aLjd/kFqzxqqzBXr4tewPjjCONnhZxDe7kYtirDFPpI4XiWIudOcu+TcJ 0CobvDF1/8DBWC/ua08USkqjAdFmStlljA3kgLkNiFOBjO2NtV0tNcDTdQDYipz+bUU8 srXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=5o57IoxtuodcfeCyYenDnPP8SlHqlbhMDuWTVrcpAQo=; b=fbi3PNjt7rnWZ+7JwxUVU1lNgn3FpTWcsia2iku1Vk5Vyv1+M0F0jZr4sGvyD65MJT sz8xQUiyE30MW6YsONg8UmMkYB7LS7bj4HDTtGthChT3g344silu5is6HL57BotKCQG4 7qvj7oOljr4ytlRanQfQJgxqY1EL694z4e4stTfMagrQtDCeILK3SVATvvt5UP4HZBVQ yWv+SScRDuJ56utiduAjDR0FFO+8mPGIfKUz3b++tdDRjBFMZULprTaZdrzYLEoQfjfJ Y/HoDggryYSvpOdiZt5ZagVskzNVwIqdeNtR+h/sDO6E7932ZvOEElA0njWAGQ9pnCng +kIA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530W96lUWOp5RtyiHrBSiwZtRoaSAKxgU93duLHDf0adjemUEQQB ruswtqWuAKZy4/0Lesh3FcTBkzvswvYhQA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx4gWDXLkL9r/GcokszMz03liOOQ6Qpjl79JJiVSDrzw+uv4IDi8EKKZ11DMMYP25dg73dchg==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:6290:: with SMTP id f16mr18201992pgv.69.1612203371648; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:16:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-37-188.volcanocom.com. [107.182.37.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p1sm18305316pfn.21.2021.02.01.10.16.10 for <dmarc@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:16:11 -0800 (PST)
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <CAL0qLwY5BbwvS9XXqBk=Mp074ntN=NeS97pJAxPBdQEZAsgohg@mail.gmail.com> <20210127203714.007C86CDB9CA@ary.qy> <CAL0qLwbN+HkGfvw79rPPvqL6jWWAsUtWY9X1gW=vAvoeQS8RHg@mail.gmail.com> <b7ea6cb8-ce79-7df7-c521-544358c1866e@crash.com> <dc398e7b-2fc6-f418-4e66-456a6c1189d6@gmail.com> <379e4493-1287-9dd5-5c8f-ae5adf949cbd@tana.it>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <7b0628bd-a47c-97c4-70bd-366cc92626b6@mtcc.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:16:09 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <379e4493-1287-9dd5-5c8f-ae5adf949cbd@tana.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/1OLi3xuwsyys1afjEwXIGk7Euqo>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops are a problem
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 18:16:14 -0000

On 2/1/21 10:08 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Mon 01/Feb/2021 17:38:07 +0100 Dave Crocker wrote:
>>
>> Consider the challenges to ensuring a DMARC pass.  That's a pretty 
>> high barrier to entry against generating reports.
>
>
> Well, if a mail site is unable to get a DMARC pass, they have more 
> urgent problems to solve than setting up aggregate report generation.
>
+1

Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email