Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops are a problem

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Mon, 01 February 2021 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B383A132C for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 09:25:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WSBF4WTJoQ3g for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 09:25:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x333.google.com (mail-ot1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EC9B3A132B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 09:25:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x333.google.com with SMTP id d7so17075794otf.3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 09:25:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=p5tGpswP2E7EFNhqwZ0i46H/aEcO05mhYEHDUXJqmrg=; b=Yizs5mG2AqSoxk7ZVUYEde9w+edpMTVnoCRfKOGDuffruiVGD2Xkh437gYDEOrIU61 XhvRhZJUFXnjeo7Tq/aQ78HlPbJvr/WsEXKhP0fpksVBZBlwadBpwOO+rLYc++1Wh+++ PXO8mQRTNMEaNC18ZhBjjvKllImbU8vWAqGcuv9Cz51Xhu/v6fTMsHYvvRmlZzbwJiyX 7FCL3UAI+6mRHuWSqGvRwFfYqAy/Lbf9YP6C9jyEVxbiNK1gaDCXYDGhIByssNDv5Rtg QvhBp6F52XS6D/sdDMeztILkMoSLOVMR7NQrGwoNMbw+iHeSL/T1GUNZUHiIB9Mvg1On HAyg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=p5tGpswP2E7EFNhqwZ0i46H/aEcO05mhYEHDUXJqmrg=; b=BsGmvalevnCv8wApWg4TvbY+kBcingin51MUxjwQZ4sj05t0gZCr5MAO/Q2TrkvSoU Lt6nMWTQH2bMAZashmueumumgJxBznDBn9vhx2WbTqzHtNlclNInu97vlpCry7CrE7Im JZcN2AsfVBgZtv3b+IGcXIBvOVq2hQPJz07sO+Nv5Cn7qHJzp0UR8gamcVGebk95nWrS 7cx5Adnw2BDhCObKpQkpA0dsEdhJUpHXYYrZTW6+NLf8aC+zGGUZnRvW5uLqCOhvc44F DdV3ZnBjOKqapIzhH8iyBpPDc701FE8xLy+cA/VXUUXlHOolZfMi67zZvceEFNogFqYB QJ7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ReOBiL4/Oa6QsRLr070/e4Euv4kqCwjXS229ZMGKWAnda0YDZ 0slrGRBqEsYlJks4r4mRrTbktAExiJ5hIg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzs/oHChG1s/MmPtKSlmgzSoIMTsjx2jr+kbx5xjAm4YMeZSYTXeF54SSHL2x9Osj3E4vqJ1w==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1e7:: with SMTP id e94mr12722415ote.219.1612200347886; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 09:25:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (108-226-162-63.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.226.162.63]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s189sm255525oif.19.2021.02.01.09.25.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Feb 2021 09:25:47 -0800 (PST)
To: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
References: <CAL0qLwY5BbwvS9XXqBk=Mp074ntN=NeS97pJAxPBdQEZAsgohg@mail.gmail.com> <20210127203714.007C86CDB9CA@ary.qy> <CAL0qLwbN+HkGfvw79rPPvqL6jWWAsUtWY9X1gW=vAvoeQS8RHg@mail.gmail.com> <b7ea6cb8-ce79-7df7-c521-544358c1866e@crash.com> <dc398e7b-2fc6-f418-4e66-456a6c1189d6@gmail.com> <316980c7-631c-4e94-c22d-7d23e99baa36@mtcc.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6af16adc-eae4-9800-92cf-6a7daf6e5064@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 09:25:46 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <316980c7-631c-4e94-c22d-7d23e99baa36@mtcc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/2ULPy9gbJofSVMhKdlZVxlfrnQI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops are a problem
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 17:25:52 -0000

On 2/1/2021 9:12 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
> On 2/1/21 8:38 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>> Mostly this will discourage reporting.  Legitimate reporting. 
>
> Versus illegitimate ones you'd assumedly want to ignore.
>

So, it's probably a good thing I emphasized:

"It should take a very, very substantial record of reporting problems to 
justify such a barrier."


d/


-- 
Dave Crocker
dcrocker@gmail.com
408.329.0791

Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
American Red Cross
dave.crocker2@redcross.org