Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
Peter Koch <pk@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> Thu, 10 May 2001 10:36 UTC
Received: from nic.cafax.se ([192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id GAA22245 for <dnsop-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 10 May 2001 06:36:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) id f4A84JCk006272 for dnsop-outgoing; Thu, 10 May 2001 10:04:19 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from gemma.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (gemma.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.136.103]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id f4A84ILt006267 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Thu, 10 May 2001 10:04:18 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from grimsvotn.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (grimsvotn.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.137.40]) by gemma.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.9.1/8.9.1/TechFak/pk+ro20000427) with SMTP id KAA25243; Thu, 10 May 2001 10:04:16 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from localhost by grimsvotn.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (SMI-8.6/pk19971205) id KAA22467; Thu, 10 May 2001 10:04:15 +0200
Message-Id: <200105100804.KAA22467@grimsvotn.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
To: Shane Kerr <shane@ripe.net>
Cc: dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 10 May 2001 01:06:53 +0200." <Pine.BSI.4.05L.10105100101550.509-100000@kantoor.ripe.net>
X-Organization: Uni Bielefeld, Technische Fakultaet
X-Phone: +49 521 106 2902
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 10:04:15 +0200
From: Peter Koch <pk@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
> Okay, I'll bite. What does it mean to have a PTR record in anything > other than the in-addr.arpa tree? While in some ways all domains are See RFC 1101 for examples of PTR RRs in "forward" name space. > equal, can't we at least say that some domains are more equal than > others? :P "EU" comes to mind ... -Peter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Nathan Jones
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Woodcock
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? itojun
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Checks performed during delegation. Bruce Campbell
- Re: Checks performed during delegation. Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? George Michaelson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Jim Reid
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Robert Elz