Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> Wed, 09 May 2001 19:33 UTC
Received: from nic.cafax.se ([192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id PAA22600 for <dnsop-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2001 15:33:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) id f49J9gJ0001974 for dnsop-outgoing; Wed, 9 May 2001 21:09:42 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from ratree.psu.ac.th (ratree.psu.ac.th [192.100.77.3]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id f49J9dLt001969 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Wed, 9 May 2001 21:09:41 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from brandenburg.cs.mu.OZ.AU (reserv150.coe.psu.ac.th [203.154.146.150]) by ratree.psu.ac.th (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA20835; Thu, 10 May 2001 02:09:38 +0700 (ICT)
Received: from brandenburg.cs.mu.OZ.AU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brandenburg.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f49J9Uh05698; Thu, 10 May 2001 02:09:30 +0700 (ICT)
From: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
To: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
cc: cathym@arin.net, dufberg@nic-se.se, dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
In-Reply-To: <200105091818.f49II1Z05093@zed.isi.edu>
References: <200105091818.f49II1Z05093@zed.isi.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 02:09:30 +0700
Message-ID: <5696.989435370@brandenburg.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 11:18:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU> Message-ID: <200105091818.f49II1Z05093@zed.isi.edu> | In fact, the "CNAME HACK" can be done w/ NS and A RRs. The CNAME HACK isn't relevant - that is just a method to get a whole bunch of names which seem as if they have to go in one zone file into different zones - it is only the data in the zone that's affected, nothing related to NS's (which is good, as NS's and CNAMES don't mix well at all). And while I could delegate junk.cs.mu.oz.au to servers in some in-addr.arpa zone, that would be unlikely to require glue (only if the servers for the in-addr.arpa zone were inside junk.cs.mu.oz.au) The likely case is nameservers for the in-addr.arpa inside the domain being delegated. And on other lists recently (and other times) one DNS implementor has made it known that he recommends doing exactly that, so much so, that his software will do it for you by default if you don't tell it where else to put the servers (or that is how I understood it). Whether that happens for in-addr.arpa domains or not I am not sure, but if you believe the reasoning for doing this (which is largely to force glue to be provided) then it probably should. kre
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Nathan Jones
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Woodcock
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? itojun
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Checks performed during delegation. Bruce Campbell
- Re: Checks performed during delegation. Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? George Michaelson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Jim Reid
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Robert Elz