Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?

itojun@iijlab.net Wed, 09 May 2001 19:41 UTC

Received: from nic.cafax.se ([192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id PAA22798 for <dnsop-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2001 15:41:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) id f49JC9CJ002005 for dnsop-outgoing; Wed, 9 May 2001 21:12:09 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from naptop.autonomica.se (flaptop.liman.sunet.se [193.10.90.102]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id f49JBxLt002000 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Wed, 9 May 2001 21:11:59 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by naptop.autonomica.se (8.12.0.Beta1/8.12.0.Beta1) id f49JAWUS000700 for dnsop@cafax.se; Wed, 9 May 2001 21:10:32 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id f496imLt023250 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Wed, 9 May 2001 08:44:48 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from itojun.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A2A4B0B; Wed, 9 May 2001 15:44:42 +0900 (JST)
To: Bruce Campbell <bruce.campbell@apnic.net>
Cc: dnsop@cafax.se
In-reply-to: bruce.campbell's message of Wed, 09 May 2001 16:33:11 +1000. <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105091625580.43413-100000@julubu.staff.apnic.net>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 15:44:42 +0900
Message-ID: <6876.989390682@itojun.org>
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk

>For those that aren't familar with our DNS operations, we manage in an
>automated fashion the reverse delegations for the Asia Pacific Region.
>
>We've assumed (in writing one of our automated delegation tests) that a
>given nameserver is 'responding' if it knows about itself, ie, can supply,
>when queried, an A/AAAA/A6 record and/or a PTR record for its own name/IP
>address.
>
>Unfortunately, we're running into a number of delegations that are failing
>as the given nameservers fail both of the above tests, ie, the given
>nameserver cannot supply any information about itself.
>
>Is the assumption that a nameserver should have information about itself
>correct?

	if possible could you give us more specific goals/scenarios during
	domain/prefix registration?

	in many of IPv6 sites they operate IPv4-only machines to serve
	AAAA/IPv6 PTR records.  i'm wondering if this raises problem against
	your assumption, and curious about the exact scenario you have.

itojun