Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
Cathy Murphy <cathym@arin.net> Wed, 09 May 2001 17:43 UTC
Received: from nic.cafax.se ([192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id NAA18957 for <dnsop-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2001 13:43:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) id f49HEilk001146 for dnsop-outgoing; Wed, 9 May 2001 19:14:44 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from rs2.arin.net (rs2.arin.net [192.149.252.22]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id f49HEhLt001141 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Wed, 9 May 2001 19:14:43 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from ops.arin.net (ops.arin.net [192.149.252.141]) by rs2.arin.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA04121; Wed, 9 May 2001 13:14:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (cathym@localhost) by ops.arin.net (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id NAA04647; Wed, 9 May 2001 13:14:40 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 13:14:40 -0400
From: Cathy Murphy <cathym@arin.net>
Reply-To: Cathy Murphy <cathym@arin.net>
To: Mats Dufberg <dufberg@nic-se.se>
cc: dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0105091747190.16973-100000@spider.nic-se.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010509124944.4658N-100000@ops.arin.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Mats Dufberg wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2001, Cathy Murphy wrote: > > > > And note, while rare, it is entirely possible for an in-addr.arpa > > > delegation to require glue A records. > > > > When would this ever happen? > > If the name of the nameserver belongs to the delegated zone: > > 3.247.212.in-addr.arpa. NS nameserver.3.247.212.in-addr.arpa. > nameserver.3.247.212.in-addr.arpa. A 1.2.3.4 Yes, I understand what a glue record is, but I don't see the likelihood of ICANN/IANA creating nameservers in the in-addr.arpa domain. At least, to date, it has not happened that I am aware. So, unless IANA does this, any nameservers delegated in the in-addr.arpa zone would not require glue A records. Theoretically possible? Yes. Rare? That implies that it happens. In the meantime, I was wondering what a realistic example would be. [Not trying to be argumentative, just covering the bases.] -Cathy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Nathan Jones
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Woodcock
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? itojun
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Checks performed during delegation. Bruce Campbell
- Re: Checks performed during delegation. Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? George Michaelson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Jim Reid
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Robert Elz