Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl> Thu, 10 May 2001 09:45 UTC
Received: from nic.cafax.se ([192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id FAA21751 for <dnsop-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 10 May 2001 05:45:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) id f4A8UPEl006401 for dnsop-outgoing; Thu, 10 May 2001 10:30:25 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from home.ds9a.nl (20dyn25.com21.casema.net [213.17.90.25]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with SMTP id f4A8UOLt006396 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Thu, 10 May 2001 10:30:24 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (qmail 22806 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2001 08:30:04 -0000
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 10:30:03 +0200
From: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>
To: dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
Message-ID: <20010510103003.A22788@home.ds9a.nl>
Mail-Followup-To: dnsop@cafax.se
References: <20010509150054.C84103@domainregistry.ie> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105100927150.43413-100000@julubu.staff.apnic.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre4i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105100927150.43413-100000@julubu.staff.apnic.net>; from bruce.campbell@apnic.net on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 09:50:26AM +1000
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 09:50:26AM +1000, Bruce Campbell wrote: > Right. Now that we've gotten that out of the way, can anyone suggest a > *reliable* test for verifying that a nameserver is responding ( which is > seperate from verifying that a nameserver is authoritatively serving a > given zone ) You could send a query for the SOA of the domain, and see if it answers with the AA flag set: $ dig ds9a.nl soa @outpost.ds9a.nl or to check automatically : $ dig ds9a.nl soa @outpost.ds9a.nl | grep "^\;\; flags" | grep -q " aa " Another check would be to ask for something in that domain that doesn't exist, and see if you get an authoritative NXDOMAIN back. Regards, bert hubert -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Services Trilab The Technology People 'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Nathan Jones
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Woodcock
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? itojun
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Checks performed during delegation. Bruce Campbell
- Re: Checks performed during delegation. Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? George Michaelson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Jim Reid
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Robert Elz