Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU> Wed, 09 May 2001 18:41 UTC
Received: from nic.cafax.se ([192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id OAA20933 for <dnsop-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2001 14:41:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) id f49IIAuf001589 for dnsop-outgoing; Wed, 9 May 2001 20:18:10 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from tnt.isi.edu (tnt.isi.edu [128.9.128.128]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id f49II9Lt001584 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Wed, 9 May 2001 20:18:09 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from zed.isi.edu (zed.isi.edu [128.9.160.57]) by tnt.isi.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f49II1P20457; Wed, 9 May 2001 11:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
Received: (from bmanning@localhost) by zed.isi.edu (8.11.0/8.8.6) id f49II1Z05093; Wed, 9 May 2001 11:18:01 -0700
Message-Id: <200105091818.f49II1Z05093@zed.isi.edu>
Subject: Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
To: cathym@arin.net
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 11:18:01 -0700
Cc: dufberg@nic-se.se, dnsop@cafax.se
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010509124944.4658N-100000@ops.arin.net> from "Cathy Murphy" at May 09, 2001 01:14:40 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
% > If the name of the nameserver belongs to the delegated zone: % > % > 3.247.212.in-addr.arpa. NS nameserver.3.247.212.in-addr.arpa. % > nameserver.3.247.212.in-addr.arpa. A 1.2.3.4 % % Yes, I understand what a glue record is, but I don't see the likelihood of % ICANN/IANA creating nameservers in the in-addr.arpa domain. At least, to % date, it has not happened that I am aware. So, unless IANA does this, any % nameservers delegated in the in-addr.arpa zone would not require glue A % records. Theoretically possible? Yes. Rare? That implies that it happens. Well, it did happen in the past. It may happen in future. In fact, the "CNAME HACK" can be done w/ NS and A RRs. % % -Cathy --bill
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Nathan Jones
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Woodcock
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? itojun
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Checks performed during delegation. Bruce Campbell
- Re: Checks performed during delegation. Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? George Michaelson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Jim Reid
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Robert Elz