Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
Bruce Campbell <bruce.campbell@apnic.net> Thu, 10 May 2001 00:10 UTC
Received: from nic.cafax.se ([192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id UAA29662 for <dnsop-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2001 20:10:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) id f49Np1lt003669 for dnsop-outgoing; Thu, 10 May 2001 01:51:01 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from guardian.apnic.net (guardian.apnic.net [203.37.255.100]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id f49NowLt003664 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Thu, 10 May 2001 01:50:59 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from mail@localhost) by guardian.apnic.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA22996 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Thu, 10 May 2001 09:50:56 +1000 (EST)
Received: from julubu.staff.apnic.net(192.168.1.37) by int-gw.staff.apnic.net via smap (V2.1) id xma022965; Thu, 10 May 01 09:50:30 +1000
Received: from localhost.staff.apnic.net ([127.0.0.1]) by julubu.staff.apnic.net with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #2) id 14xdiu-000Bvx-00 for dnsop@cafax.se; Thu, 10 May 2001 09:50:28 +1000
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 09:50:26 +1000
From: Bruce Campbell <bruce.campbell@apnic.net>
X-Sender: bc@julubu.staff.apnic.net
To: dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
In-Reply-To: <20010509150054.C84103@domainregistry.ie>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105100927150.43413-100000@julubu.staff.apnic.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
On Wed, 9 May 2001, James Raftery wrote: > And for IE too. An authoritative nameserver is authoritative for a > finite set of zones. There is no reason to presume the auth. server's > own A RR is in one of the zones it's serving. Right. Now that we've gotten that out of the way, can anyone suggest a *reliable* test for verifying that a nameserver is responding ( which is seperate from verifying that a nameserver is authoritatively serving a given zone ) -- Bruce Campbell <bruce.campbell@apnic.net> +61-7-3367-0490 Systems Administrator APNIC
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Nathan Jones
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Woodcock
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? itojun
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Checks performed during delegation. Bruce Campbell
- Re: Checks performed during delegation. Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? George Michaelson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Jim Reid
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Robert Elz