IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?

Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU> Thu, 31 May 2001 00:42 UTC

Received: from nic.cafax.se ([192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id UAA28090 for <dnsop-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 30 May 2001 20:42:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) id f4V0KXf1025549 for dnsop-outgoing; Thu, 31 May 2001 02:20:33 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from tnt.isi.edu (tnt.isi.edu [128.9.128.128]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id f4V0KWLt025544 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Thu, 31 May 2001 02:20:32 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from zed.isi.edu (zed.isi.edu [128.9.160.57]) by tnt.isi.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4V0KVZ23108; Wed, 30 May 2001 17:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
Received: (from bmanning@localhost) by zed.isi.edu (8.11.0/8.8.6) id f4V0KVm27053; Wed, 30 May 2001 17:20:31 -0700
Message-Id: <200105310020.f4V0KVm27053@zed.isi.edu>
Subject: Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
To: bruce.campbell@apnic.net
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 17:20:30 -0700
Cc: dnsop@cafax.se
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105310930110.58053-100000@julubu.staff.apnic.net> from "Bruce Campbell" at May 31, 2001 09:44:33 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

% Then (taking into account the RIR's previous experience with glue records
% and the resounding lack of people caring about the reverse tree etc), what
% would be the 'best' way of doing this?

	DataPoint:
	for 1q2001
	
	Brittle data indicates ~60% of the in-addr.arpa tree is not mappable.
	Mice&Men data indicates ~75% of the forward tree is not mappable.
	
	Which tree is more broken?

-- 
--bill

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email