Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
Sam Trenholme <namedroppers@local.reachin.com> Thu, 10 May 2001 17:01 UTC
Received: from nic.cafax.se ([192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id NAA03434 for <dnsop-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 10 May 2001 13:01:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) id f4AGhB6j009320 for dnsop-outgoing; Thu, 10 May 2001 18:43:11 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from artemas.reachin.com (artemas.reachin.com [64.14.214.33]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with SMTP id f4AGh9Lt009315 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Thu, 10 May 2001 18:43:10 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (qmail 892 invoked by uid 1233); 10 May 2001 09:43:06 -0700
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 May 2001 09:43:06 -0700
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 09:43:06 -0700
From: Sam Trenholme <namedroppers@local.reachin.com>
X-Sender: <namedroppers@artemas.reachin.com>
To: dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105100942510.879-100000@artemas.reachin.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
> Mark> Send it a non-recursive query. A nameserver should > Mark> always answer even if it is just a header containing > Mark> refused, servfail or notimp. > > Yes, but there is one notorious DNS implementation that doesn't do > that. It fails to return any answer -- not even a referral for . -- if > it's asked for a name that it isn't authoritative for. Fortunatly, his other suggestion about sending a status opcode will get a "not implemented" response from the "nortorious implementation" in question. The only DNS server I know about that has version out there that don't correctly handle the "status" opcode is my own implentation of a DNS server. It used to handle a status query like a normal query. In fact, Mark's posting made me realize that my implementation had this problem. In light of his posting, I just released a new bugfix release because of this issue. - Sam
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Nathan Jones
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Woodcock
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? itojun
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Checks performed during delegation. Bruce Campbell
- Re: Checks performed during delegation. Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? George Michaelson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Jim Reid
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Robert Elz