Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
Mats Dufberg <dufberg@nic-se.se> Sat, 12 May 2001 20:32 UTC
Received: from nic.cafax.se ([192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id QAA19970 for <dnsop-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sat, 12 May 2001 16:32:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) id f4CK8Zqv022978 for dnsop-outgoing; Sat, 12 May 2001 22:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from spider.nic-se.se (spider.nic-se.se [212.247.3.67]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id f4CK8YLt022973 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Sat, 12 May 2001 22:08:34 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (dufberg@localhost) by spider.nic-se.se (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4CK7uI12230; Sat, 12 May 2001 22:07:59 +0200 (CEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: spider.nic-se.se: dufberg owned process doing -bs
Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 22:07:56 +0200
From: Mats Dufberg <dufberg@nic-se.se>
To: Kenneth Porter <shiva@well.com>
cc: "dnsop@cafax.se" <dnsop@cafax.se>
Subject: Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
In-Reply-To: <200105111437.HAA23205@mail.well.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0105122204290.12107-100000@spider.nic-se.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Kenneth Porter wrote: > > non-authoritative > > SOA mismatches across supplied nameservers > > NS listing mismatches across supplied nameservers (both what they > > supply and whats in the actual zone file) > > How tolerant are you of transient mismatches? One would expect them > during zone updates. Speaking of the SE TLD, we always reject updates where we find any difference in SOA serial, SOA mail address, NS records or A records corresponding to necessary glue records between any of the nameservers. Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg +46-8-545 857 06 dufberg@nic-se.se fax: +46-8-545 857 29
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Nathan Jones
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Woodcock
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? itojun
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Checks performed during delegation. Bruce Campbell
- Re: Checks performed during delegation. Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? George Michaelson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Jim Reid
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Robert Elz