Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
Mark.Andrews@nominum.com Thu, 10 May 2001 01:54 UTC
Received: from nic.cafax.se ([192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id VAA01781 for <dnsop-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2001 21:54:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) id f4A1Po2w004940 for dnsop-outgoing; Thu, 10 May 2001 03:25:50 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (drugs.dv.isc.org [130.155.191.236]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id f4A1PjLt004935 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Thu, 10 May 2001 03:25:47 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from nominum.com (localhost.dv.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4A1PQv51440; Thu, 10 May 2001 11:25:28 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from marka@nominum.com)
Message-Id: <200105100125.f4A1PQv51440@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: Bruce Campbell <bruce.campbell@apnic.net>
Cc: dnsop@cafax.se
From: Mark.Andrews@nominum.com
Subject: Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 10 May 2001 09:50:26 +1000." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105100927150.43413-100000@julubu.staff.apnic.net>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 11:25:26 +1000
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
> > On Wed, 9 May 2001, James Raftery wrote: > > > And for IE too. An authoritative nameserver is authoritative for a > > finite set of zones. There is no reason to presume the auth. server's > > own A RR is in one of the zones it's serving. > > Right. Now that we've gotten that out of the way, can anyone suggest a > *reliable* test for verifying that a nameserver is responding ( which is > seperate from verifying that a nameserver is authoritatively serving a > given zone ) Send it a non-recursive query. A nameserver should always answer even if it is just a header containing refused, servfail or notimp. With this in mind the status opcode would be a good one to use. It should always come back notimp/refused. Mark > > -- > Bruce Campbell <bruce.campbell@apnic.net> +61-7-3367-0490 > Systems Administrator APNIC > > -- Mark Andrews, Nominum Inc. 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews@nominum.com
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Nathan Jones
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Woodcock
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? itojun
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Checks performed during delegation. Bruce Campbell
- Re: Checks performed during delegation. Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? George Michaelson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Jim Reid
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Robert Elz