Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> Wed, 09 May 2001 16:28 UTC
Received: from nic.cafax.se ([192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id MAA15253 for <dnsop-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2001 12:28:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) id f49G4Mfg000513 for dnsop-outgoing; Wed, 9 May 2001 18:04:22 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from ratree.psu.ac.th (ratree.psu.ac.th [192.100.77.3]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id f49G4ILt000508 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Wed, 9 May 2001 18:04:20 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from brandenburg.cs.mu.OZ.AU (reserv150.coe.psu.ac.th [203.154.146.150]) by ratree.psu.ac.th (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA17082; Wed, 9 May 2001 23:04:17 +0700 (ICT)
Received: from brandenburg.cs.mu.OZ.AU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brandenburg.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f49G4Dh04066; Wed, 9 May 2001 23:04:14 +0700 (ICT)
From: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
To: Cathy Murphy <cathym@arin.net>
cc: Bruce Campbell <bruce.campbell@apnic.net>, dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010509111201.4658E-100000@ops.arin.net>
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010509111201.4658E-100000@ops.arin.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 23:04:13 +0700
Message-ID: <4064.989424253@brandenburg.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 11:13:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Cathy Murphy <cathym@arin.net> Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010509111201.4658E-100000@ops.arin.net> | When would this ever happen? Cricket and Mats answered already. The important thing to be aware of is that there aren't any different types of domain based upon their names - all domains are created equal, and remain equal. Any domain can have any RR in it. Any time you're tempted to generalise based upon domain name, you're almost invariably going to be wrong. The only significance the various domain name trees have is how one registers in them (what the various registrars will allow to be registered there) and what lookups are conventionally directed to them (as a first resort, a CNAME (or DNAME) can then point you anywhere). Technically, everything that applies to one domain applies to every domain (with the root domain as the one and only special case). kre
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Nathan Jones
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Woodcock
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? itojun
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Checks performed during delegation. Bruce Campbell
- Re: Checks performed during delegation. Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? George Michaelson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Jim Reid
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Robert Elz