Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 09 May 2001 14:55 UTC

Received: from nic.cafax.se ([192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id KAA10107 for <dnsop-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2001 10:55:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) id f49E4lV6029458 for dnsop-outgoing; Wed, 9 May 2001 16:04:47 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from rip.psg.com (rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id f49E4kLt029453 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Wed, 9 May 2001 16:04:47 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from randy by rip.psg.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14xUZX-000FHU-00; Wed, 09 May 2001 07:04:11 -0700
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
Cc: Bruce Campbell <bruce.campbell@apnic.net>, dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105091625580.43413-100000@julubu.staff.apnic.net> <2588.989409075@brandenburg.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
Message-Id: <E14xUZX-000FHU-00@rip.psg.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 07:04:11 -0700
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> The only people this doesn't work with are a few DNS broker types who
> somehow have formed the opinion that the delegation should happen first,
> and that after it happens, then they will set up their servers to handle
> the zone.

i run the registrar/registry for a half dozen cctlds.  there are registrants
who keep insisting on this.  i have canned email in an elisp macro to tell
them they are welcome to insist all they wish.  they are also welcome to
register domains.  their choice.

randy