Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
Mats Dufberg <dufberg@nic-se.se> Thu, 10 May 2001 09:43 UTC
Received: from nic.cafax.se ([192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id FAA21725 for <dnsop-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 10 May 2001 05:43:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) id f4A8mcnO006467 for dnsop-outgoing; Thu, 10 May 2001 10:48:38 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from spider.nic-se.se (spider.nic-se.se [212.247.3.67]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id f4A8mcLt006462 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Thu, 10 May 2001 10:48:38 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (dufberg@localhost) by spider.nic-se.se (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4A8mWf10100; Thu, 10 May 2001 10:48:32 +0200 (CEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: spider.nic-se.se: dufberg owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 10:48:32 +0200
From: Mats Dufberg <dufberg@nic-se.se>
To: Jim Reid <Jim.Reid@nominum.com>
cc: dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
In-Reply-To: <30735.989481354@shell.nominum.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0105101044410.7329-100000@spider.nic-se.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Jim Reid wrote: > Mark> Send it a non-recursive query. A nameserver should > Mark> always answer even if it is just a header containing > Mark> refused, servfail or notimp. > > Yes, but there is one notorious DNS implementation that doesn't do > that. It fails to return any answer -- not even a referral for . -- if > it's asked for a name that it isn't authoritative for. Then it isn't responding, in its true sense. Our control mechanisms of DNS delegations should not try to handle all buggy servers. In that case the error message will be "timeout" instead of "non-authoritative answer". Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg +46-8-545 857 06 dufberg@nic-se.se fax: +46-8-545 857 29
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Nathan Jones
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Woodcock
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? itojun
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Checks performed during delegation. Bruce Campbell
- Re: Checks performed during delegation. Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? George Michaelson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Jim Reid
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Robert Elz