IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Forces-protocol] RE: GET/SET in one msg ?

"Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com> Fri, 15 October 2004 22:58 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA01960 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 18:58:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CIbDm-00082M-D8 for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 19:10:50 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CIb0d-0000TI-7j; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 18:57:15 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CIazk-0008Mj-V1 for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 18:56:21 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA01837 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 18:56:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from fmr06.intel.com ([134.134.136.7] helo=caduceus.jf.intel.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CIbBC-0007z3-6r for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 19:08:11 -0400
Received: from petasus.jf.intel.com (petasus.jf.intel.com [10.7.209.6]) by caduceus.jf.intel.com (8.12.9-20030918-01/8.12.9/d: major-outer.mc,v 1.15 2004/01/30 18:16:28 root Exp $) with ESMTP id i9FMtDSU002211; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 22:55:13 GMT
Received: from orsmsxvs041.jf.intel.com (orsmsxvs041.jf.intel.com [192.168.65.54]) by petasus.jf.intel.com (8.12.9-20030918-01/8.12.9/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.11 2004/07/29 22:51:53 root Exp $) with SMTP id i9FMwwWO015729; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 22:59:14 GMT
Received: from orsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.60]) by orsmsxvs041.jf.intel.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.2.35) with SMTP id M2004101515554308192 ; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:55:43 -0700
Received: from orsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.52]) by orsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:55:43 -0700
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:55:41 -0700
Message-ID: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E02E60C6D@orsmsx408>
Thread-Topic: GET/SET in one msg ?
Thread-Index: AcSwX/tJ1YR4E8A4SFiND3Xz2pGrGwCmdcigAAPoovAAAApaMA==
From: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>
To: "Yang, Lily L" <lily.l.yang@intel.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jhalpern@MEGISTO.com>, zsolt@petri-meat.com, Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>, Alan DeKok <alan.dekok@idt.com>, "Deleganes, Ellen M" <ellen.m.deleganes@intel.com>, ram.gopal@nokia.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Oct 2004 22:55:43.0107 (UTC) FILETIME=[19709530:01C4B30A]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.31 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: forces-protocol@ietf.org
Subject: [Forces-protocol] RE: GET/SET in one msg ?
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 50a516d93fd399dc60588708fd9a3002
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

No, I don't that's why I asked...since this was coming from Joel's
proposal.
I didn't get a good reason from his email either, but it seems like he
would like to have it supported by the protocol anyway.

Joel, do you have any examples for us ?


Thanks
Hormuzd 

-----Original Message-----
From: Yang, Lily L 
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 3:52 PM
To: Khosravi, Hormuzd M; 'Joel M. Halpern'; 'zsolt@petri-meat.com';
'Steven Blake'; 'Alan DeKok'; Deleganes, Ellen M; 'ram.gopal@nokia.com'
Cc: 'forces-protocol@ietf.org'
Subject: RE: GET/SET in one msg ?

I don't understand why you would want to do such a thing. Do you have
any example in mind? 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Khosravi, Hormuzd M 
> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 2:04 PM
> To: Joel M. Halpern; zsolt@petri-meat.com; Steven Blake; 
> Yang, Lily L; Alan DeKok; Deleganes, Ellen M; ram.gopal@nokia.com
> Cc: forces-protocol@ietf.org
> Subject: GET/SET in one msg ?
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> We (protocol team) are finalizing some of the msgs and one of 
> the issues which is being discussed is whether GET/SET 
> operation need to be combined in a single msg...(currently we 
> have them as separate msgs). I have never seen this being 
> done in practice i.e. command bundling of GET/SET, but if you 
> guys have some experience/opinions on this, pls do let us know.
> 
> 
> Thanks a lot,
> Hormuzd
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email