IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts are IETF stakeholders

Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com> Tue, 27 June 2023 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095EBC1575B3 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.085
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.085 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Jb0-jKNQH6f for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.open-xchange.com (mx3.open-xchange.com [87.191.57.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3662FC169539 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:10:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imap.open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [10.20.28.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx3.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 61C3F6A0D8; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 17:10:47 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1687878647; bh=EJ/ZDqte1surrIITJXG7IbWHvT7i5vJ5AnORY1vs3b8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=3S463oAhCWJ/hMn+NZmJMI9/ghkM2cpaNlLqROSf8F4roWDCax57ZksP/nRdq4h/H H75Sz2uhXzuVz4sQ5U4JiYPErLho6CGkCTO24A6mVuU+WQbdEVTjTHIEQvYDq/MGJC IuAsmHL6Ix4CA94eHd0nD2IiWIieCc2hKYy27Vpzkb+i5LKYsGtc9vIsqtsIUa4DVC 9YpJJY/vgitnHuRxACZNPMoKbsl9F6AK3j/Egc3Rc+qTJrkf6XIxwBbZK7+B9xgMoF jrU+MkMxZF1AaquwkBqBt4rqDEIMk/biCHgu5Y2Qs/wrKoxCSp/s8oenM7zMQoAZgT j57EjnrZpYmRQ==
Received: from appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com ([10.20.28.81]) by imap.open-xchange.com with ESMTPSA id fjhpIPf7mmQa4QwA3c6Kzw (envelope-from <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 17:10:47 +0200
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 17:10:47 +0200
From: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
To: Stacie Hoffmann <stacie.hoffmann=40dcms.gov.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: gendispatch@ietf.org
Message-ID: <1581018401.44788.1687878647487@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFWDOZB7b38jak4eg-uqyVc-2J=Y9eV2zrkoTD5TAbr2AstHrg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <15c65bec-0a31-918b-ff1c-828361b68ab2@lear.ch> <20230624024249.DF9BCFA78580@ary.qy> <CAFWDOZB7b38jak4eg-uqyVc-2J=Y9eV2zrkoTD5TAbr2AstHrg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_44786_889046916.1687878647475"
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev47
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
Autocrypt: addr=vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBFhFR+UBCACfoywFKBRfzasiiR9/6dwY36eLePXcdScumDMR8qoXvRS55QYDjp5bs+yMq41qWV9 xp/cqryY9jnvHbeF3TsE5yEazpD1dleRbkpElUBpPwXqkrSP8uXO9KkS9KoX6gdml6M4L+F82WpqYC1 uTzOE6HPmhmQ4cGSgoia2jolxAhRpzoYN99/BwpvoZeTSLP5K6yPlMPYkMev/uZlAkMMhelli9IN6yA yxcC0AeHSnOAcNKUr13yXyMlTyi1cdMJ4sk88zIbefxwg3PAtYjkz3wgvP96cNVwAgSt4+j/ZuVaENP pgVuM512m051j9SlspWDHtzrci5pBKKFsibnTelrABEBAAG0NUJlcnRvbGEsIFZpdHRvcmlvIDx2aXR 0b3Jpby5iZXJ0b2xhQG9wZW4teGNoYW5nZS5jb20+iQFABBMBAgAqBAsJCAcGFQoJCAsCBRYCAwEAAp 4BAhsDBYkSzAMABQMAAAAABYJYRUflAAoJEIU2cHmzj8qNaG0H/ROY+suCP86hoN+9RIV66Ej8b3sb8 UgwFJOJMupZfeb9yTIJwE4VQT5lTt146CcJJ5jvxD6FZn1Htw9y4/45pPAF7xLE066jg3OqRvzeWRZ3 IDUfJJIiM5YGk1xWxDqppSwhnKcMOuI72iioWxX0nGQrWxpnWJsjt08IEEwuYucDkul1PHsrLJbTd58 fiMKLVwag+IE1SPHOwkPF6arZQZIfB5ThtOZV+36Jn8Hok9XfeXWBVyPkiWCQYVX39QsIbr0JNR9kQy 4g2ZFexOcTe8Jo12jPRL7V8OqStdDes3cje9lWFLnX05nrfLuE0l0JKWEg8akN+McFXc+oV68h7nu5A Q0EWEVH5QEIAIDKanNBe1uRfk8AjLirflZO291VNkOAeUu+dIhecGnZeQW6htlDinlYOnXhtsY1mK9W PUu+xshDq7lXn2G0LxldYwyJYZaJtDgIKqVqwxfA34Lj27oqPuXwcvGhdCgt0SW/YcalRdAi0/AzUCu 5GSaj2kaGUSnBYYUP4szGJXjaK2psP5toQSCtx2pfSXQ6MaqPK9Zzy+D5xc6VWQRp/iRImodAcPf8fg JJvRyJ8Jla3lKWyvBBzJDg6MOf6Fts78bJSt23X0uPp93g7GgbYkuRMnFI4RGoTVkxjD/HBEJ0CNg22 hoHJondhmKnZVrHEluFuSnW0wBEIYomcPSPB+cAEQEAAYkBMQQYAQIAGwUCWEVH5QIbDAQLCQgHBhUK CQgLAgUJEswDAAAKCRCFNnB5s4/KjdO8B/wNpvWtOpLdotR/Xh4fu08Fd63nnNfbIGIETWsVi0Sbr8i E5duuGaaWIcMmUvgKe/BM0Fpj9X01Zjm90uoPrlVVuQWrf+vFlbalUYVZr51gl5UyUFHk+iAZCAA0WB rsmACKvuV1P7GuiX3UV9b59T9taYJxN3dNFuftrEuvsqHimFtlekUjUwoCekTJdncFusBhwz2OrKhHr WWrEsXkfh0+pURWYAlKlTxvXuI7gAfHEQM+6OnrWvXYtlhd0M1sBPnCjbyG63Qws7Rek9bEWKtH6dA6 dmT2FQT+g1S9Mdf0WkPTQNX0x24dm8IoHuD3KYwX7Svx43Xa17aZnXqUjtj1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/ApBZ6qn4D_l7vZsGEvVz5MHm4L0>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts are IETF stakeholders
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 15:11:06 -0000

 

> Il 27/06/2023 15:52 BST Stacie Hoffmann <stacie.hoffmann=40dcms.gov.uk@dmarc.ietf.org> ha scritto:
> 
> Another discussion point that was brought up is the terminology ‘policy expert’. We have seen this chain use “non-technical”, “people engaged in policy issues” (PEPI) and “policy specialist”. This is an important consideration we will take away, as well as making sure the definition is clear. We’re focusing on addressing these challenges for a wider group of policy experts not limited to those from governments, including the likes of civil society, academia, industry etc. 
> 
"Policy experts" points at people who, while sometimes advocating a specific view, can understand multiple viewpoints and multiple stakeholder needs and work for a reasonable compromise that can obtain consensus. However, when you discuss policy, you will also encounter people who are not "policy experts", but just want to bring the view of some stakeholders and ensure that their needs are considered. In other words, not all people participate because of their policy-making skills or experience; some just participate because they have a stake in the topic. This is why I would steer away from words like expert or specialist if possible.

--

Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange
vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com mailto:vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com
Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email