IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Reliable message delivery (was Re: Technical feedback.)

Pieter Hintjens <ph@imatix.com> Wed, 03 February 2010 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <pieterh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB3A3A6C63 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:50:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uMWzHJXmr80G for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:50:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com (mail-iw0-f174.google.com [209.85.223.174]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36133A6C60 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:50:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iwn4 with SMTP id 4so1553093iwn.27 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:51:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; bh=41HnjlxXIRN6NUD/bNwyBhvF1A16CCpa084W5V7/rrg=; b=dA1LqD5k1S3GdNtlhtLMIcYEvG/PHtp/hlyxutw/p1WC5+b1rI5rPKv6w5skEN1FTK Fh0lYDJh5LvmjFBGlsphw2lEWWziBb47EWW8l2G9lxJ7N79llzBczfg3NFfI4uxrgji4 U6//vZWqafhyc5eXGT6i9PqLasN6BxTTdobpY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=ZFlR+A4q/ka+na8yQK2riJMkho/R739yUuwWDqsqiVTZvf3AQJpYWRHG5F9WKoBSqz wlmfDnG3EkI08ltgqfXs3trYp6Cc8KBbpwcDSHgOk9u+y6B2APdgPWRyF+QTyAuabIiS Vjs+qYlxuTURaJMs/Cfu4W4aHX23hM7n329+s=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: pieterh@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.154.207 with SMTP id p15mr2621659ibw.91.1265212290309; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:51:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4B6983CC.9050203@webtide.com>
References: <4B62C5FE.8090904@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4B672C9D.9010205@ericsson.com> <op.u7gy9bag64w2qv@annevk-t60> <96935605-E8B8-4718-B60F-570FD2C199E4@apple.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002012354380.3846@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <F21A8D9A-1E27-48C8-8818-0BB6872A2CE4@apple.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002020056460.21600@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4B694A1E.3050300@ninebynine.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002031020560.26790@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4B6983CC.9050203@webtide.com>
From: Pieter Hintjens <ph@imatix.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:51:09 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 358cd415549c09ff
Message-ID: <5821ea241002030751l1e8b414atd450a69179337c56@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Reliable message delivery (was Re: Technical feedback.)
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:50:54 -0000

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com> wrote:

> I don't think you can assume that most websocket using software
> and/or subprotocols will have the same developer working on
> the client side and the server side.

I've never seen a protocol that makes this assumption and it is a
quite extraordinary one from the perspective of interoperabilty.

Ian, could you elaborate please?  I do not understand your intention
in making this statement, nor how significant it is to implementing
WebSocket.

-Pieter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email