IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Reliable message delivery (was Re: Technical feedback.)

"Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com> Tue, 02 February 2010 00:07 UTC

Return-Path: <annevk@opera.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B203A6A2D for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:07:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lzQB8hn5c31l for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:07:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.opera.com (smtp.opera.com [213.236.208.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFDF3A69EF for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:07:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from annevk-t60 (5355737B.cable.casema.nl [83.85.115.123]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.opera.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id o1204nmH026747 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 2 Feb 2010 00:04:50 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
References: <4B62C5FE.8090904@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4B62E516.2010003@webtide.com> <5c902b9e1001290756r3f585204h32cacd6e64fbebaa@mail.gmail.com> <4B636757.3040307@webtide.com> <8449BE19-3061-4512-B563-02973FBB707B@apple.com> <5c902b9e1001292310l5442d476n8375139f3480671b@mail.gmail.com> <26D406E7-2319-476E-9ADF-80D84200C270@apple.com> <5c902b9e1001292333k79569316lf371938c9aa766@mail.gmail.com> <128BFD31-9835-47B1-B7A9-F20F5CDA8D8C@apple.com> <20100130144936.GD19124@shareable.org> <5c902b9e1001301552n6efb7969o34110373e3ab4945@mail.gmail.com> <4B672C9D.9010205@ericsson.com> <op.u7gy9bag64w2qv@annevk-t60> <4B675CA6.2070406@webtide.com> <op.u7g04dun64w2qv@annevk-t60> <4B676ABE.9060901@webtide.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:08:27 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Organization: Opera Software ASA
Message-ID: <op.u7g30dfu64w2qv@annevk-t60>
In-Reply-To: <4B676ABE.9060901@webtide.com>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.10 (Linux)
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Reliable message delivery (was Re: Technical feedback.)
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:07:54 -0000

On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:58:54 +0100, Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com> wrote:
> But I would think that reasonable error handling should be part
> of the base protocol.  It's like suggesting that 400 Bad Request
> be taken out of HTTP.

Well yes, but WebSockets is not meant to be like HTTP. The idea is to just  
have a simple layer on top of TCP that makes it suitable for deployment in  
Web browsers. I would expect something like SPDY to provide the (far) more  
complex variant.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email