IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Reliable message delivery (was Re: Technical feedback.)

Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> Tue, 02 February 2010 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633D23A6AC9 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:04:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.987
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.987 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.010, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CUO1QdoIJYLJ for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:04:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qy0-f198.google.com (mail-qy0-f198.google.com [209.85.221.198]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A903F3A6979 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:04:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so308531qyk.15 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:05:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=fDO1/VY30HGyBTusrNXcj6h1ZCpInpNs3aUB/2F4cQg=; b=IemB6Oi/Do0zpaL5N0d+GLfrbVyEcpYlyAyrKubMev/VysYqo/1m8omOtXJ4GHRPrh 9rV5Sye0Cndo0UeMS7MNLp3wr1yjUu1ZXNxzBPf2GOvZEEQVkXKv2pZSyBaT03qH/DXt DTRmaaMZ1l3sEb8qchrzyxynvdjZteCn4nMDc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=GAMvrEkvQLFZrk6m1YHdl8AnEv42ASqB/WksfZgrdAoyTBLtlPBXcRMc32sVX5jBaT oydaTTFV4jgwh20Exjs4T107jAS4LP9cNJdiEgLtk7iJgUvL8w28ncCB/3IsCGoK2W9m g3GHYii86yRRJKvCZIcgUEAgDgi+YeeIpQbdQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com
Received: by 10.143.21.25 with SMTP id y25mr72474wfi.206.1265130316211; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:05:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D17188F8-4B5B-41B4-993F-7AF0DC0B4D47@apple.com>
References: <5c902b9e1001292310l5442d476n8375139f3480671b@mail.gmail.com> <20100130144936.GD19124@shareable.org> <5c902b9e1001301552n6efb7969o34110373e3ab4945@mail.gmail.com> <4B672C9D.9010205@ericsson.com> <op.u7gy9bag64w2qv@annevk-t60> <96935605-E8B8-4718-B60F-570FD2C199E4@apple.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F032E5065ED@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <20100202012534.GB32743@shareable.org> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F032E50667D@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <D17188F8-4B5B-41B4-993F-7AF0DC0B4D47@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:05:14 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: e8dcddfff5e4e38e
Message-ID: <5c902b9e1002020905x5f38c65epa82d8b25ff044d6b@mail.gmail.com>
From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>, "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Reliable message delivery (was Re: Technical feedback.)
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:04:43 -0000

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
> If either of these concerns makes half-close-only impractical, then I think Jamie's suggestion is the best: allow any of half-close, explicit close frame, or both.

Given how hard it is to get useful (or consistent) TCP error
information from most OS stacks, I think having an explicit close
frame in the common case is going to be well worth it in the long run.

My $.02.  -- justin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email