Re: [hybi] Process! was: [whatwg] HttpOnly cookie for WebSocket?

[SM <[e-mail]>]

At 14:12 29-01-10, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>I no Ian does not put much stock in charters, but this one
>http://www.whatwg.org/charter has a tiny foot note that says:

As some of the discussion has been about talking to the WHATWG, my 
question is to find out who is talking on behalf of the group.

At 14:21 29-01-10, Jamie Lokier wrote:
>If one specification does not address significant requirements, and
>the other specification does but will take a long time to arrive, then
>it may well be in the interest of the internet community to have both.

That's the extreme alternative and it could be unpleasant.

At 14:17 29-01-10, Jamie Lokier wrote:
>This is how it looks to me:
>
>It's about different groups of people, so the term "consensus" is
>being used to mean different things in this discussion; hence conflict
>and emotion.  (There is also a mismatch of expectations, which I will

Yes.

Regards,
-sm