Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)

Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 08 October 2017 01:38 UTC

Return-Path: <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D1F133078; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 18:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0UKeu3Ebt6VW; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 18:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41AB613207A; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 18:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id b189so14575068wmd.4; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 18:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jtpHMdeoDr3UE9Q0O5VI6i73YAK5YSJdwpBL53lZank=; b=dK06z+fYKdXfTEbrkuQldosOf45aXC6we5pqso2jpd+18QPz9Gaofmjr2H6Qiy6dRj Fk6U/ds/CiQO8mk8FCfn++FaRzJ3t27Fh2ELy8KQy87u9C0KwiIsN1tvvEcmdoJ0QSLs Eu0ydyv/L5MoxeHDRela/heGEfA7NxCyvrCUdUHIizcWt2uwbXrluiyQeWiXG/x65XaT 3g259OtJyGoeApqWpbwEID7tGZa/Zk0ISPaXLCk+fSMCy7dYFwW5Af5mc7rvRyQPzjqa ymZp8ko2U0ZkBOzhLJOQF4Ts5ECeBGTkJD/T6Hq2WXFMMSU/RR56YtkjhKAWWgR0uFgQ TIZQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jtpHMdeoDr3UE9Q0O5VI6i73YAK5YSJdwpBL53lZank=; b=dgloRm5d15lC+VaLQy8tc/8hZ5mjLRAOHdnIi+Gk8wPx083PiE1AgQqGrx0xE3b+hi 3zFb7i/JDhZCMhrUax7+wfuqSsmZBJTvib3Jnx7dVEEToY/AHipwtxIGVPyRXOf8Qv7V BODdfkTLsssJQQr0W/8oAqE+KoJQhRmCLObcr3p0+FEM3QB579i1iuGtSox6gFCLn6O1 gdBQM7MkSE5QQkdh0kaVWH9m92vXKF29hxwYWKNhFXjuGOkNPh6+1OBAHeu3VbeJLYkc 218SK91/4bpQhwspc3tAqrTvZw+r7tfa1VHjWPIt0Kafm7nxR6BlE3oA2lmKcd0Y8Yae jN2g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXqt9XDsURhDQlCfo8lgsu7Heb+N4TVUpkUESz4IN/RLwUXiH1C q1g7TU9USWBlCWaLm5CWMxJqe9t/TprFZ8tAyBQbNA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCf9e5q3RG/40VqV2sI09GrTQb3MpI9DGlXR95ACatB5qozk6fppPpCMm2/wtd4t7v4xsknSoDtcR4o8E741n8=
X-Received: by 10.223.186.82 with SMTP id t18mr6062708wrg.19.1507426703323; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 18:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.173.86 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 18:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20171007163002.11c897a0@elandnews.com>
References: <150670160872.14128.2758037992338326085.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20171007163002.11c897a0@elandnews.com>
From: Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 18:38:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CAG-CQxpnHKtov+pj6YFL0wxnO3YX7mbLUA9uHUkVQbHqE3A1rQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>, ideas@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e082452d02d3888055aff2150"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/AGRlNUpZa5hI1vcns430knprcbU>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2017 01:38:27 -0000

On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 4:43 PM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> At 09:13 AM 29-09-2017, The IESG wrote:
>
>> A new IETF WG has been proposed in the Routing Area. The IESG has not made
>> any determination yet. The following draft charter was submitted, and is
>> provided for informational purposes only. Please send your comments to the
>> IESG mailing list (iesg@ietf.org) by 2017-10-09.
>>
>
> I took a quick look at the drafts for the proposed working group and I
> came across the following: "An Identity uniquely identifies a Communication
> Entity" and "To put it simply, while the IDy of a communicating entity is
> obfuscated to outside observers, it is revealed to communicating parties
> with a legitimate need to know.  Legitimate parties include either end of
> entities itself or regulatory authorities or authorized edge nodes
> (routers/IDf based firewalls) in the network."
>


> I assume that the proposed working group will be creating an embedded
> identifier so that legitimate parties can track Internet users.  I don't
> think that it is a good idea.
>

Not sure if you have been following the discussions the last few days and
emails today.  The charter which is under review is not trying to create an
embedded identifier to track users.

The draft in question is being updated and the authors are doing for
clarification.

Padma


> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
>