Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Thu, 05 October 2017 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0B81331FF; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 09:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RroEhipbGLSU; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 09:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22f.google.com (mail-pg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AEE6132F3F; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 09:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id b11so8501367pgn.12; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=z8/3nxqFNqwDE0FodKDwFogzOQqyzxa+G9DDbhKP928=; b=Xfrrc9mN/znVegdOo0FmMhD/O8MJ7qV9lmIjMH+gRJ6tbQFfp9M678wmlpu8TmFb6N hS7flgXqEpAFVuOFwRJN1JKiTTwNMtHamror7I1u4tS/NHEG5oH3w3sJGWifw3AG5bmB mB508gUtuo5owY/8871K7x+bpsVxkUTnNv/NKeBzKPYZDUrfAmOQXmZgMF+Vul5JcpBp F3OhznHuerarmX1dTRZcqF67XS0arpGtUcSvwIDcdF3UnNn4Xik+fwrxi9jI+RKx1Qqj 8Lhbz8HHqTblhww6gOz92hRCTuBaCX3C8ByDecyLEHmrDhUfjcdRbU2WR5NoLcQuBD4+ fObg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=z8/3nxqFNqwDE0FodKDwFogzOQqyzxa+G9DDbhKP928=; b=QcbEaS1BRWp+932QMTmyXxcJ4rZXM/ij3d8T5q9z/F/wngtUnqIFe6t/q1HLFChEdk jKKansDcT3axUeR8jkDvgGx2X4b/0rqCvOE+iSsf2hrwgyqGOZ1iPQ/rXIlMmTysD1Nu 20vYsdhaq1ljK2I8HcmZA74T0SZ9r+AWSK+7J5KcKj55ruACtEayTG1HfQlXp5v9YO5+ aMHx1sC0eSFFLK0XVd2x1t+awr+VQPeuOlCVDuOpPQu/Ki88pHaPrR/hiZnscS2kYbxr /DdLDxpCOoD4CAHNJz+9jUyU+CCQcXGmAdR+4+ks6qA7HI3cx8+xO8dEuhcbDlL4i/Db J0KQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaWfxaXJKBEop6HZ8yNtQqvf0pExQrVd8AcBXxKeERtpygX9Cwu6 qoj7olocHHWNbmjzsK79R78=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QB0RI2jeUBiDTmHvgDJc2SpOI1nw3mr6wXiE1+8GxbXThymobsQ6neop5vfeT1hc3PY/5q0Dw==
X-Received: by 10.159.252.11 with SMTP id n11mr8717766pls.172.1507221052221; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.197.31.157] (173-11-119-245-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [173.11.119.245]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s81sm36044203pfg.162.2017.10.05.09.30.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <cc091145-49bb-9990-90aa-e3b12b4deeba@huitema.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 09:30:50 -0700
Cc: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, "ideas@ietf.org" <ideas@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DAA7818D-9896-4469-948C-B9E9D57E0C63@gmail.com>
References: <e476f817-580b-9083-48bb-72de1745f1c1@huitema.net> <67067a23-bb7f-08e4-3766-8802d8f3121f@huitema.net> <45e8993a73ef4bb9b3914f32c4609823@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <B158AE04-F14F-48DA-A91D-F0CC2BC3A711@gmail.com> <cc091145-49bb-9990-90aa-e3b12b4deeba@huitema.net>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/oS9D5AhG_6-yx_2U7UrV8wk_tdE>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 16:30:55 -0000

> Dino, I am well aware that we (well, you) *can* engineer ID/LOC networks
> to have good privacy properties. But I am also aware that if this is not
> an explicit goal in the charter, we may very well end up with

Agree 100%.

> architectures that have pretty bad properties. For example, most ID/LOC
> architectures rely on a database that provides the up-to-date LOC for an
> ID. In my bad dreams, I could see the database extended to provide other
> properties of the ID, such as subscriber ID. Similarly, there was a
> proposal some time ago to have a unique IPv6 identifier for every EU
> citizen; that bad idea was quashed, but we could easily see something
> like that resurface as on unique ID per user. That's why I would like to
> see the proposed charter to be crystal clear about privacy requirements,
> rather than just say that we will think about it.

Well, your dream is going to come true. There will be an IPv6 EID per IoT device.  ;-)

Dino