Re: Proposed New Note Well

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 22 March 2016 01:14 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019E412D1AB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OAEcHM3C_v6I for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22f.google.com (mail-pf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 872B912D0B8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id u190so287248234pfb.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qHLW/Ztyy0HaiNr96NBJdPUx8GyuLl84sjXRD5ytwrQ=; b=l3fh9wuwZUlweHoi8ItsKRx+xzEvfvqeVNGTpUkXlUBWeUzH7qwBvq3oVUI6Lo9M87 POiavR9hy02s4vQBSvC8BaGQ184zASzFHjKdVcIfPeS12SmnmGMokfih2OwhLUX6JqOE Ye+/6RMetPNmqZuOQY4zBeo0LaxVS7bd4hMos0c/Z1O2CB2rShyZXYiUUWx081dXOq4T hAPjBNc/ZfnyBJ7c3zuTMg/Rx0Rtp9xbZq+xAW/sBq/oUeKGPq2jrRwR3noqYJT/FKRx mnEvsa78wqLTQBoj86ZxPuh0Qy2G9vr87+ksbOejkz/Zx6W0X9u8cO/cDz9ALycSNT+2 VcKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qHLW/Ztyy0HaiNr96NBJdPUx8GyuLl84sjXRD5ytwrQ=; b=Mt8svugiOHWY1sbqHPX0X6/CtjH3oCi+RgMBoPdRPtgzGBwKyMajoxxxswPfQFtzo1 ZtfIunaiuYWuO0N8jMghreAgEFaN174huoO+VeBXtvunPzpdnzE+k2OPepRL1ZPf+fNV ZJ0nDxarKpSel2QKsBazaSbRJE+YC7QMQ7j7ZKesDhnL1va1aP3OINpH+TgNAS7rripr qVOSSXfWfTSb2Qj1AoHbImqIF9AHfxLiyaE+3TX/y0Af8aHOTYkAXeosiPFNfOW9ehwb ulFrFTZ6WkRsWlObZEvxZA4x4XWSTBMx5x2U/oi8WdRScy2o6bejITJ6+htx2y8s9/np BEiw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLqGUyTldIluVm991skDWNbrvzKBy3wbZlyaQy4ms/OUbdt4YEIOSKoCW/yux/n6w==
X-Received: by 10.66.139.234 with SMTP id rb10mr49407562pab.104.1458609293179; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:4373:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:4373:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z68sm43487475pfi.19.2016.03.21.18.14.50 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Proposed New Note Well
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20160321165157.31914.47506.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <56F09C8C.4060104@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:14:52 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160321165157.31914.47506.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/CHqvqTp3-B5Nm1ZGHTnAdJdSDng>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 01:14:55 -0000

Hi,

I could live with this, although I am still happy enough with the old version.

> By participating in the IETF,

I think this should say

 By participating in the IETF in person, remotely, or on-line,

> ​BCP 25 (Working Group processes)
> BCP 25 (Anti-Harassment Procedures)

Why two separate lines, when BCP 9 (6 different RFCs) only gets one line?

Regards
   Brian