IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: NTPv5: big picture

Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Mon, 04 January 2021 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <kurt@roeckx.be>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED75D3A0DC0 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 06:35:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ItwnMcb1sEPV for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 06:35:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from excelsior.roeckx.be (excelsior.roeckx.be [IPv6:2a05:7300:0:100::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FF5A3A0DBB for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 06:35:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from intrepid.roeckx.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by excelsior.roeckx.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6029A8A00AF; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 14:35:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by intrepid.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 82A351FE0DFD; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 15:35:00 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 15:35:00 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
Cc: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>, doug.arnold@meinberg-usa.com
Message-ID: <X/MnlJoHMEW5rG1Y@roeckx.be>
References: <20210101025440.ECE3340605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> <0DF4D79B-29BA-4DB0-A3D6-EE3B6AE807DF@meinberg-usa.com> <5FF32347020000A10003DF2E@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5FF32347020000A10003DF2E@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/A-A63zcf8lDfEU5UGE5jzPjfYs8>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: NTPv5: big picture
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 14:35:06 -0000

On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 03:16:39PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Should dynamic addition, reconfiguration and deletion of time sources be a
> SHOULD for v5 at least?

I think the draft should not document a protocol for how to do
that. That is an implementation detail. It should probably not
even go over the UDP port.


Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email