IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: CLOCK_TAI (was NTPv5: big picture)

Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> Fri, 08 January 2021 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18C63A1117 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 08:03:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.038
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.038 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WKVNdnrd1bZ7 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 08:03:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net [64.139.1.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30473A10B0 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 08:03:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shuksan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545C940605C; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 08:03:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3
To: Martin Burnicki <martin.burnicki=40meinberg.de@dmarc.ietf.org>
cc: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, hmurray@megapathdsl.net
From: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
In-Reply-To: Message from Martin Burnicki <martin.burnicki=40meinberg.de@dmarc.ietf.org> of "Fri, 08 Jan 2021 16:47:15 +0100." <617faa37-0edb-4e48-b4eb-c0bf2d57b809@meinberg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 08:03:37 -0800
Message-Id: <20210108160337.545C940605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/BnrFzw3KK-yS9MGoBzYgTj3QQhk>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: CLOCK_TAI (was NTPv5: big picture)
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 16:03:45 -0000

martin.burnicki=40meinberg.de@dmarc.ietf.org said:
> Beside this, there are lots of potential problems due to different shapes and
> intervals for the smearing.

Is that a real problem?  I thought that the big boys had agreed on linear over 
24 hours centered on the leap.

-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email