Re: [Ntp] NTP Security (was NTPv5: big picture)

James Browning <jamesb.fe80@gmail.com> Sun, 17 January 2021 01:44 UTC

Return-Path: <jamesb.fe80@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE583A1B1E for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 17:44:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.846
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.846 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rtN8JTr-7bRk for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 17:44:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa2b.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CC313A1B1F for <ntp@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 17:44:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa2b.google.com with SMTP id d6so3158706vkb.13 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 17:44:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=chfPdCdKP39T2qUjlwZKc0Dc2tBlRKa40xSoTmd5lrk=; b=R+Pm+QxvJBp/7JpOOdKWX3HB+dpkkn4H4jhS10NSRUVGFmmvx3T55L7v+qc88tqZSF 7ncucyuS+FmRWVZyjUD3QgmtfrQuG+Lt7M9ZLCvbSW3lxOTV2DKBdrCbvMbKeEqhdQYM p1iD237W1UPzmwt8ryKXBvTwqkw2CBn7AG7+QwoDBP3B1b1jJdKDsu9ZroMFTDOUV+w/ V5R17OzFAFuImGz4+ZgqZLFW4TsMNNJIu0KRSxPN81mlpcommM1hgFNsA67yHNNW0dsX 9saIy3M3DT7t0nSNwKSa6xH1ZDjm4KLPbvxRQEnDBfr9rFjI05HHDUbQ7LwJxE9Ke4Ch kJ1g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=chfPdCdKP39T2qUjlwZKc0Dc2tBlRKa40xSoTmd5lrk=; b=q+xz+AitECzyN+mTlTxSbH2iFSb9MC52t5PxVas++IUm59HlPf2FZq2nOanyQhFtMC ha/7VzhC+J1BoO3yCL+bID7lPm7qFOFIN7Jy4BCNzr7sfjf/0rZMtMGMKI+wAT4jKAGW uYSjrXp0VEvOzNGXfx/ZvtGs5vthZsHoikCzS94Q0iJjNyZscJMbwK7wiJjHcYjncqmR zBq3JEBUBwrwTFsdTrF8M+MVSzRD9b2WSJOq9IE5loegqbnnOnVgxXgz/DfVueRnajg5 uoJIklaYOpvYMm1iZQ7CXuNAUGPp0cjVQIgh+F9yv60SxXEs+6AajaZZHg/S7pH/7lOu 5nLQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5339XiAPNqjfs0QbDoSgvb9aoh9ZsLkDMyjsBPdVqZloC4gunzwD 5JRstmEM/G1MfgWM75hR3TNjAJ6zXdMw/8G3mV9BLHp3dQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznPAEP5WYt72sbiGPq0ZbknHuHHfiJPo3Xh45buNwV6IcpMy/3annNRGXt9U4wCN5QP3rWTGvJ5GZj7SYOm3s=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:1f96:: with SMTP id f144mr14764804vkf.16.1610847876920; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 17:44:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <rsalz@akamai.com> <993FEEB5-F498-472E-813E-E684E273612F@akamai.com> <20210102050501.7D0DE40605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> <26A97601-BEB4-4914-B570-6C8BD9C72FAD@akamai.com> <CACsn0cm=d3z+ceTDMaw2LDHg_AeNoxbs411iEFNpGpnWcyvZvw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFTY+dAMNZF_qPbzo2Fsj1LtF5+s-cze5s52rxBZSk6ofzG9gQ@mail.gmail.com> <YAN4PSgwEOVYkAJF@roeckx.be> <512ec7f6-0758-2df9-6361-c3abab347309@nwtime.org>
In-Reply-To: <512ec7f6-0758-2df9-6361-c3abab347309@nwtime.org>
From: James Browning <jamesb.fe80@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 17:44:21 -0800
Message-ID: <CAFTY+dD-750nvT5j3S-LDMULMbsp59rvni_ymvYaFyfYEovFDw@mail.gmail.com>
To: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Cc: James Browning <jamesb.fe80@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007dbaa705b90ebfe7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/RjxnMRuOTRC_fV5atMxTDtKQDc4>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] NTP Security (was NTPv5: big picture)
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 01:44:40 -0000

On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 5:13 PM Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org> wrote:

> On 1/16/2021 3:35 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I think if we want to do it with DNS, it would require DNSSEC, and
> > that the client validates DNSSEC.
>
> How do you reliably use DNSSEC if you don't know what time it is?
>

1) don't
2) if not taking a big step it should already be well under ~17 minutes off.
3) if taking a big step store the result and evaluate later.
4) whatever handwaving will be used for the TLS certificates.
Probably those in reverse order.