IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: NTPv5: big picture

Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> Mon, 04 January 2021 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <mlichvar@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E661A3A0DEA for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 07:21:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.25, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a92M1GOAaxOv for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 07:21:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 341DF3A0DE8 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 07:21:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1609773669; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FPfA1NbonwnDM2gF6mffA/narQY1McUCO+zz2m6YyMU=; b=Rp1R7v3+ydUJ2q7SYZ/BrX2OXCuGZ8nYApmR9X/XfCVLhqAsEYNzAywal9yOdKMzpPmvBu ZGg3ZeJJQ21MieWqwZ4n4X+Z1GaXebvP5gjhJkCwRfD5WkPyZntyXdSR9vwQgGGPKjRmNQ aBZ2b5v4+ruH6dE2lYVZTpN1BdDxal0=
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-25-WR5Iy0FAM_Gw5ItevINsGA-1; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 10:21:05 -0500
X-MC-Unique: WR5Iy0FAM_Gw5ItevINsGA-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4499C180A086; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 15:21:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (holly.tpb.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com [10.43.134.11]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C67C019726; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 15:21:02 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 16:21:01 +0100
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Cc: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, doug.arnold@meinberg-usa.com, Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
Message-ID: <20210104152101.GC2992437@localhost>
References: <20210101025440.ECE3340605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> <0DF4D79B-29BA-4DB0-A3D6-EE3B6AE807DF@meinberg-usa.com> <5FF32347020000A10003DF2E@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <X/MnlJoHMEW5rG1Y@roeckx.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <X/MnlJoHMEW5rG1Y@roeckx.be>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=mlichvar@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/hy41gNyfPwfeqkQg8FUIlkMUQAc>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: NTPv5: big picture
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 15:21:12 -0000

On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 03:35:00PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 03:16:39PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > Should dynamic addition, reconfiguration and deletion of time sources be a
> > SHOULD for v5 at least?
> 
> I think the draft should not document a protocol for how to do
> that. That is an implementation detail. It should probably not
> even go over the UDP port.

I agree. NTPv5 should not define the "control" or "private" modes.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email